[llvm-commits] [llvm] r140865 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
Jim Grosbach
grosbach at apple.com
Fri Sep 30 11:09:54 PDT 2011
Author: grosbach
Date: Fri Sep 30 13:09:53 2011
New Revision: 140865
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=140865&view=rev
Log:
Tidy up. Trailing whitespace.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp?rev=140865&r1=140864&r2=140865&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineCompares.cpp Fri Sep 30 13:09:53 2011
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
bool IsSigned) {
if (!IsSigned)
return Result->getValue().ugt(In1->getValue());
-
+
if (In2->isNegative())
return Result->getValue().slt(In1->getValue());
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
// True if LHS u> RHS and RHS == high-bit-mask - 1
TrueIfSigned = true;
return RHS->isMaxValue(true);
- case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
+ case ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE:
// True if LHS u>= RHS and RHS == high-bit-mask (2^7, 2^15, 2^31, etc)
TrueIfSigned = true;
return RHS->getValue().isSignBit();
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
return (~CI->getValue() + 1).isPowerOf2();
}
-/// ComputeSignedMinMaxValuesFromKnownBits - Given a signed integer type and a
+/// ComputeSignedMinMaxValuesFromKnownBits - Given a signed integer type and a
/// set of known zero and one bits, compute the maximum and minimum values that
/// could have the specified known zero and known one bits, returning them in
/// min/max.
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
// bit if it is unknown.
Min = KnownOne;
Max = KnownOne|UnknownBits;
-
+
if (UnknownBits.isNegative()) { // Sign bit is unknown
Min.setBit(Min.getBitWidth()-1);
Max.clearBit(Max.getBitWidth()-1);
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
KnownZero.getBitWidth() == Max.getBitWidth() &&
"Ty, KnownZero, KnownOne and Min, Max must have equal bitwidth.");
APInt UnknownBits = ~(KnownZero|KnownOne);
-
+
// The minimum value is when the unknown bits are all zeros.
Min = KnownOne;
// The maximum value is when the unknown bits are all ones.
@@ -202,10 +202,10 @@
CmpInst &ICI, ConstantInt *AndCst) {
// We need TD information to know the pointer size unless this is inbounds.
if (!GEP->isInBounds() && TD == 0) return 0;
-
+
ConstantArray *Init = dyn_cast<ConstantArray>(GV->getInitializer());
if (Init == 0 || Init->getNumOperands() > 1024) return 0;
-
+
// There are many forms of this optimization we can handle, for now, just do
// the simple index into a single-dimensional array.
//
@@ -220,15 +220,15 @@
// type they index. Collect the indices. This is typically for arrays of
// structs.
SmallVector<unsigned, 4> LaterIndices;
-
+
Type *EltTy = cast<ArrayType>(Init->getType())->getElementType();
for (unsigned i = 3, e = GEP->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
ConstantInt *Idx = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(GEP->getOperand(i));
if (Idx == 0) return 0; // Variable index.
-
+
uint64_t IdxVal = Idx->getZExtValue();
if ((unsigned)IdxVal != IdxVal) return 0; // Too large array index.
-
+
if (StructType *STy = dyn_cast<StructType>(EltTy))
EltTy = STy->getElementType(IdxVal);
else if (ArrayType *ATy = dyn_cast<ArrayType>(EltTy)) {
@@ -237,14 +237,14 @@
} else {
return 0; // Unknown type.
}
-
+
LaterIndices.push_back(IdxVal);
}
-
+
enum { Overdefined = -3, Undefined = -2 };
// Variables for our state machines.
-
+
// FirstTrueElement/SecondTrueElement - Used to emit a comparison of the form
// "i == 47 | i == 87", where 47 is the first index the condition is true for,
// and 87 is the second (and last) index. FirstTrueElement is -2 when
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@
// FirstFalseElement/SecondFalseElement - Used to emit a comparison of the
// form "i != 47 & i != 87". Same state transitions as for true elements.
int FirstFalseElement = Undefined, SecondFalseElement = Undefined;
-
+
/// TrueRangeEnd/FalseRangeEnd - In conjunction with First*Element, these
/// define a state machine that triggers for ranges of values that the index
/// is true or false for. This triggers on things like "abbbbc"[i] == 'b'.
@@ -263,25 +263,25 @@
/// index in the range (inclusive). We use -2 for undefined here because we
/// use relative comparisons and don't want 0-1 to match -1.
int TrueRangeEnd = Undefined, FalseRangeEnd = Undefined;
-
+
// MagicBitvector - This is a magic bitvector where we set a bit if the
// comparison is true for element 'i'. If there are 64 elements or less in
// the array, this will fully represent all the comparison results.
uint64_t MagicBitvector = 0;
-
-
+
+
// Scan the array and see if one of our patterns matches.
Constant *CompareRHS = cast<Constant>(ICI.getOperand(1));
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Init->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
Constant *Elt = Init->getOperand(i);
-
+
// If this is indexing an array of structures, get the structure element.
if (!LaterIndices.empty())
Elt = ConstantExpr::getExtractValue(Elt, LaterIndices);
-
+
// If the element is masked, handle it.
if (AndCst) Elt = ConstantExpr::getAnd(Elt, AndCst);
-
+
// Find out if the comparison would be true or false for the i'th element.
Constant *C = ConstantFoldCompareInstOperands(ICI.getPredicate(), Elt,
CompareRHS, TD);
@@ -295,15 +295,15 @@
FalseRangeEnd = i;
continue;
}
-
+
// If we can't compute the result for any of the elements, we have to give
// up evaluating the entire conditional.
if (!isa<ConstantInt>(C)) return 0;
-
+
// Otherwise, we know if the comparison is true or false for this element,
// update our state machines.
bool IsTrueForElt = !cast<ConstantInt>(C)->isZero();
-
+
// State machine for single/double/range index comparison.
if (IsTrueForElt) {
// Update the TrueElement state machine.
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@
SecondTrueElement = i;
else
SecondTrueElement = Overdefined;
-
+
// Update range state machine.
if (TrueRangeEnd == (int)i-1)
TrueRangeEnd = i;
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@
SecondFalseElement = i;
else
SecondFalseElement = Overdefined;
-
+
// Update range state machine.
if (FalseRangeEnd == (int)i-1)
FalseRangeEnd = i;
@@ -340,12 +340,12 @@
FalseRangeEnd = Overdefined;
}
}
-
-
+
+
// If this element is in range, update our magic bitvector.
if (i < 64 && IsTrueForElt)
MagicBitvector |= 1ULL << i;
-
+
// If all of our states become overdefined, bail out early. Since the
// predicate is expensive, only check it every 8 elements. This is only
// really useful for really huge arrays.
@@ -365,20 +365,20 @@
if (!GEP->isInBounds() &&
Idx->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() > TD->getPointerSizeInBits())
Idx = Builder->CreateTrunc(Idx, TD->getIntPtrType(Idx->getContext()));
-
+
// If the comparison is only true for one or two elements, emit direct
// comparisons.
if (SecondTrueElement != Overdefined) {
// None true -> false.
if (FirstTrueElement == Undefined)
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getFalse(GEP->getContext()));
-
+
Value *FirstTrueIdx = ConstantInt::get(Idx->getType(), FirstTrueElement);
-
+
// True for one element -> 'i == 47'.
if (SecondTrueElement == Undefined)
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Idx, FirstTrueIdx);
-
+
// True for two elements -> 'i == 47 | i == 72'.
Value *C1 = Builder->CreateICmpEQ(Idx, FirstTrueIdx);
Value *SecondTrueIdx = ConstantInt::get(Idx->getType(), SecondTrueElement);
@@ -392,36 +392,36 @@
// None false -> true.
if (FirstFalseElement == Undefined)
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getTrue(GEP->getContext()));
-
+
Value *FirstFalseIdx = ConstantInt::get(Idx->getType(), FirstFalseElement);
// False for one element -> 'i != 47'.
if (SecondFalseElement == Undefined)
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE, Idx, FirstFalseIdx);
-
+
// False for two elements -> 'i != 47 & i != 72'.
Value *C1 = Builder->CreateICmpNE(Idx, FirstFalseIdx);
Value *SecondFalseIdx = ConstantInt::get(Idx->getType(),SecondFalseElement);
Value *C2 = Builder->CreateICmpNE(Idx, SecondFalseIdx);
return BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(C1, C2);
}
-
+
// If the comparison can be replaced with a range comparison for the elements
// where it is true, emit the range check.
if (TrueRangeEnd != Overdefined) {
assert(TrueRangeEnd != FirstTrueElement && "Should emit single compare");
-
+
// Generate (i-FirstTrue) <u (TrueRangeEnd-FirstTrue+1).
if (FirstTrueElement) {
Value *Offs = ConstantInt::get(Idx->getType(), -FirstTrueElement);
Idx = Builder->CreateAdd(Idx, Offs);
}
-
+
Value *End = ConstantInt::get(Idx->getType(),
TrueRangeEnd-FirstTrueElement+1);
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, Idx, End);
}
-
+
// False range check.
if (FalseRangeEnd != Overdefined) {
assert(FalseRangeEnd != FirstFalseElement && "Should emit single compare");
@@ -430,13 +430,13 @@
Value *Offs = ConstantInt::get(Idx->getType(), -FirstFalseElement);
Idx = Builder->CreateAdd(Idx, Offs);
}
-
+
Value *End = ConstantInt::get(Idx->getType(),
FalseRangeEnd-FirstFalseElement);
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT, Idx, End);
}
-
-
+
+
// If a 32-bit or 64-bit magic bitvector captures the entire comparison state
// of this load, replace it with computation that does:
// ((magic_cst >> i) & 1) != 0
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@
V = Builder->CreateAnd(ConstantInt::get(Ty, 1), V);
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE, V, ConstantInt::get(Ty, 0));
}
-
+
return 0;
}
@@ -466,11 +466,11 @@
/// to generate the first by knowing that pointer arithmetic doesn't overflow.
///
/// If we can't emit an optimized form for this expression, this returns null.
-///
+///
static Value *EvaluateGEPOffsetExpression(User *GEP, InstCombiner &IC) {
TargetData &TD = *IC.getTargetData();
gep_type_iterator GTI = gep_type_begin(GEP);
-
+
// Check to see if this gep only has a single variable index. If so, and if
// any constant indices are a multiple of its scale, then we can compute this
// in terms of the scale of the variable index. For example, if the GEP
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(GEP->getOperand(i))) {
// Compute the aggregate offset of constant indices.
if (CI->isZero()) continue;
-
+
// Handle a struct index, which adds its field offset to the pointer.
if (StructType *STy = dyn_cast<StructType>(*GTI)) {
Offset += TD.getStructLayout(STy)->getElementOffset(CI->getZExtValue());
@@ -495,24 +495,24 @@
break;
}
}
-
+
// If there are no variable indices, we must have a constant offset, just
// evaluate it the general way.
if (i == e) return 0;
-
+
Value *VariableIdx = GEP->getOperand(i);
// Determine the scale factor of the variable element. For example, this is
// 4 if the variable index is into an array of i32.
uint64_t VariableScale = TD.getTypeAllocSize(GTI.getIndexedType());
-
+
// Verify that there are no other variable indices. If so, emit the hard way.
for (++i, ++GTI; i != e; ++i, ++GTI) {
ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(GEP->getOperand(i));
if (!CI) return 0;
-
+
// Compute the aggregate offset of constant indices.
if (CI->isZero()) continue;
-
+
// Handle a struct index, which adds its field offset to the pointer.
if (StructType *STy = dyn_cast<StructType>(*GTI)) {
Offset += TD.getStructLayout(STy)->getElementOffset(CI->getZExtValue());
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@
Offset += Size*CI->getSExtValue();
}
}
-
+
// Okay, we know we have a single variable index, which must be a
// pointer/array/vector index. If there is no offset, life is simple, return
// the index.
@@ -536,14 +536,14 @@
}
return VariableIdx;
}
-
+
// Otherwise, there is an index. The computation we will do will be modulo
// the pointer size, so get it.
uint64_t PtrSizeMask = ~0ULL >> (64-IntPtrWidth);
-
+
Offset &= PtrSizeMask;
VariableScale &= PtrSizeMask;
-
+
// To do this transformation, any constant index must be a multiple of the
// variable scale factor. For example, we can evaluate "12 + 4*i" as "3 + i",
// but we can't evaluate "10 + 3*i" in terms of i. Check that the offset is a
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@
int64_t NewOffs = Offset / (int64_t)VariableScale;
if (Offset != NewOffs*(int64_t)VariableScale)
return 0;
-
+
// Okay, we can do this evaluation. Start by converting the index to intptr.
Type *IntPtrTy = TD.getIntPtrType(VariableIdx->getContext());
if (VariableIdx->getType() != IntPtrTy)
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@
// know pointers can't overflow since the gep is inbounds. See if we can
// output an optimized form.
Value *Offset = EvaluateGEPOffsetExpression(GEPLHS, *this);
-
+
// If not, synthesize the offset the hard way.
if (Offset == 0)
Offset = EmitGEPOffset(GEPLHS);
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@
bool isTrue = ICmpInst::isTrueWhenEqual(Pred);
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::get(ICI.getType(), isTrue));
}
-
+
// (X+4) == X -> false.
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, ConstantInt::getFalse(X->getContext()));
@@ -699,22 +699,22 @@
// From this point on, we know that (X+C <= X) --> (X+C < X) because C != 0,
// so the values can never be equal. Similarly for all other "or equals"
// operators.
-
+
// (X+1) <u X --> X >u (MAXUINT-1) --> X == 255
// (X+2) <u X --> X >u (MAXUINT-2) --> X > 253
// (X+MAXUINT) <u X --> X >u (MAXUINT-MAXUINT) --> X != 0
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULE) {
- Value *R =
+ Value *R =
ConstantExpr::getSub(ConstantInt::getAllOnesValue(CI->getType()), CI);
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT, X, R);
}
-
+
// (X+1) >u X --> X <u (0-1) --> X != 255
// (X+2) >u X --> X <u (0-2) --> X <u 254
// (X+MAXUINT) >u X --> X <u (0-MAXUINT) --> X <u 1 --> X == 0
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE)
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT, X, ConstantExpr::getNeg(CI));
-
+
unsigned BitWidth = CI->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
ConstantInt *SMax = ConstantInt::get(X->getContext(),
APInt::getSignedMaxValue(BitWidth));
@@ -727,14 +727,14 @@
// (X+ -1) <s X --> X >s (MAXSINT- -1) --> X != 127
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLE)
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, X, ConstantExpr::getSub(SMax, CI));
-
+
// (X+ 1) >s X --> X <s (MAXSINT-(1-1)) --> X != 127
// (X+ 2) >s X --> X <s (MAXSINT-(2-1)) --> X <s 126
// (X+MAXSINT) >s X --> X <s (MAXSINT-(MAXSINT-1)) --> X <s 1
// (X+MINSINT) >s X --> X <s (MAXSINT-(MINSINT-1)) --> X <s -2
// (X+ -2) >s X --> X <s (MAXSINT-(-2-1)) --> X <s -126
// (X+ -1) >s X --> X <s (MAXSINT-(-1-1)) --> X == -128
-
+
assert(Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE);
Constant *C = ConstantInt::get(X->getContext(), CI->getValue()-1);
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT, X, ConstantExpr::getSub(SMax, C));
@@ -746,14 +746,14 @@
ConstantInt *DivRHS) {
ConstantInt *CmpRHS = cast<ConstantInt>(ICI.getOperand(1));
const APInt &CmpRHSV = CmpRHS->getValue();
-
- // FIXME: If the operand types don't match the type of the divide
+
+ // FIXME: If the operand types don't match the type of the divide
// then don't attempt this transform. The code below doesn't have the
// logic to deal with a signed divide and an unsigned compare (and
- // vice versa). This is because (x /s C1) <s C2 produces different
+ // vice versa). This is because (x /s C1) <s C2 produces different
// results than (x /s C1) <u C2 or (x /u C1) <s C2 or even
- // (x /u C1) <u C2. Simply casting the operands and result won't
- // work. :( The if statement below tests that condition and bails
+ // (x /u C1) <u C2. Simply casting the operands and result won't
+ // work. :( The if statement below tests that condition and bails
// if it finds it.
bool DivIsSigned = DivI->getOpcode() == Instruction::SDiv;
if (!ICI.isEquality() && DivIsSigned != ICI.isSigned())
@@ -769,14 +769,14 @@
}
// Compute Prod = CI * DivRHS. We are essentially solving an equation
- // of form X/C1=C2. We solve for X by multiplying C1 (DivRHS) and
- // C2 (CI). By solving for X we can turn this into a range check
- // instead of computing a divide.
+ // of form X/C1=C2. We solve for X by multiplying C1 (DivRHS) and
+ // C2 (CI). By solving for X we can turn this into a range check
+ // instead of computing a divide.
Constant *Prod = ConstantExpr::getMul(CmpRHS, DivRHS);
// Determine if the product overflows by seeing if the product is
// not equal to the divide. Make sure we do the same kind of divide
- // as in the LHS instruction that we're folding.
+ // as in the LHS instruction that we're folding.
bool ProdOV = (DivIsSigned ? ConstantExpr::getSDiv(Prod, DivRHS) :
ConstantExpr::getUDiv(Prod, DivRHS)) != CmpRHS;
@@ -786,9 +786,9 @@
/// If the division is known to be exact, then there is no remainder from the
/// divide, so the covered range size is unit, otherwise it is the divisor.
ConstantInt *RangeSize = DivI->isExact() ? getOne(Prod) : DivRHS;
-
+
// Figure out the interval that is being checked. For example, a comparison
- // like "X /u 5 == 0" is really checking that X is in the interval [0, 5).
+ // like "X /u 5 == 0" is really checking that X is in the interval [0, 5).
// Compute this interval based on the constants involved and the signedness of
// the compare/divide. This computes a half-open interval, keeping track of
// whether either value in the interval overflows. After analysis each
@@ -806,7 +806,7 @@
// to the same result value.
HiOverflow = AddWithOverflow(HiBound, LoBound, RangeSize, false);
}
-
+
} else if (DivRHS->getValue().isStrictlyPositive()) { // Divisor is > 0.
if (CmpRHSV == 0) { // (X / pos) op 0
// Can't overflow. e.g. X/2 op 0 --> [-1, 2)
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@
if (!HiOverflow)
HiOverflow = SubWithOverflow(HiBound, Prod, RangeSize, true);
}
-
+
// Dividing by a negative swaps the condition. LT <-> GT
Pred = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Pred);
}
@@ -902,7 +902,7 @@
Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldICmpShrCst(ICmpInst &ICI, BinaryOperator *Shr,
ConstantInt *ShAmt) {
const APInt &CmpRHSV = cast<ConstantInt>(ICI.getOperand(1))->getValue();
-
+
// Check that the shift amount is in range. If not, don't perform
// undefined shifts. When the shift is visited it will be
// simplified.
@@ -910,48 +910,48 @@
uint32_t ShAmtVal = (uint32_t)ShAmt->getLimitedValue(TypeBits);
if (ShAmtVal >= TypeBits || ShAmtVal == 0)
return 0;
-
+
if (!ICI.isEquality()) {
// If we have an unsigned comparison and an ashr, we can't simplify this.
// Similarly for signed comparisons with lshr.
if (ICI.isSigned() != (Shr->getOpcode() == Instruction::AShr))
return 0;
-
+
// Otherwise, all lshr and most exact ashr's are equivalent to a udiv/sdiv
// by a power of 2. Since we already have logic to simplify these,
// transform to div and then simplify the resultant comparison.
if (Shr->getOpcode() == Instruction::AShr &&
(!Shr->isExact() || ShAmtVal == TypeBits - 1))
return 0;
-
+
// Revisit the shift (to delete it).
Worklist.Add(Shr);
-
+
Constant *DivCst =
ConstantInt::get(Shr->getType(), APInt::getOneBitSet(TypeBits, ShAmtVal));
-
+
Value *Tmp =
Shr->getOpcode() == Instruction::AShr ?
Builder->CreateSDiv(Shr->getOperand(0), DivCst, "", Shr->isExact()) :
Builder->CreateUDiv(Shr->getOperand(0), DivCst, "", Shr->isExact());
-
+
ICI.setOperand(0, Tmp);
-
+
// If the builder folded the binop, just return it.
BinaryOperator *TheDiv = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Tmp);
if (TheDiv == 0)
return &ICI;
-
+
// Otherwise, fold this div/compare.
assert(TheDiv->getOpcode() == Instruction::SDiv ||
TheDiv->getOpcode() == Instruction::UDiv);
-
+
Instruction *Res = FoldICmpDivCst(ICI, TheDiv, cast<ConstantInt>(DivCst));
assert(Res && "This div/cst should have folded!");
return Res;
}
-
-
+
+
// If we are comparing against bits always shifted out, the
// comparison cannot succeed.
APInt Comp = CmpRHSV << ShAmtVal;
@@ -960,25 +960,25 @@
Comp = Comp.lshr(ShAmtVal);
else
Comp = Comp.ashr(ShAmtVal);
-
+
if (Comp != CmpRHSV) { // Comparing against a bit that we know is zero.
bool IsICMP_NE = ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
Constant *Cst = ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(ICI.getContext()),
IsICMP_NE);
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Cst);
}
-
+
// Otherwise, check to see if the bits shifted out are known to be zero.
// If so, we can compare against the unshifted value:
// (X & 4) >> 1 == 2 --> (X & 4) == 4.
if (Shr->hasOneUse() && Shr->isExact())
return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), Shr->getOperand(0), ShiftedCmpRHS);
-
+
if (Shr->hasOneUse()) {
// Otherwise strength reduce the shift into an and.
APInt Val(APInt::getHighBitsSet(TypeBits, TypeBits - ShAmtVal));
Constant *Mask = ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(), Val);
-
+
Value *And = Builder->CreateAnd(Shr->getOperand(0),
Mask, Shr->getName()+".mask");
return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), And, ShiftedCmpRHS);
@@ -993,7 +993,7 @@
Instruction *LHSI,
ConstantInt *RHS) {
const APInt &RHSV = RHS->getValue();
-
+
switch (LHSI->getOpcode()) {
case Instruction::Trunc:
if (ICI.isEquality() && LHSI->hasOneUse()) {
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@
APInt Mask(APInt::getHighBitsSet(SrcBits, SrcBits-DstBits));
APInt KnownZero(SrcBits, 0), KnownOne(SrcBits, 0);
ComputeMaskedBits(LHSI->getOperand(0), Mask, KnownZero, KnownOne);
-
+
// If all the high bits are known, we can do this xform.
if ((KnownZero|KnownOne).countLeadingOnes() >= SrcBits-DstBits) {
// Pull in the high bits from known-ones set.
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@
}
}
break;
-
+
case Instruction::Xor: // (icmp pred (xor X, XorCST), CI)
if (ConstantInt *XorCST = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(LHSI->getOperand(1))) {
// If this is a comparison that tests the signbit (X < 0) or (x > -1),
@@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@
if ((ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT && RHSV == 0) ||
(ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT && RHSV.isAllOnesValue())) {
Value *CompareVal = LHSI->getOperand(0);
-
+
// If the sign bit of the XorCST is not set, there is no change to
// the operation, just stop using the Xor.
if (!XorCST->isNegative()) {
@@ -1031,13 +1031,13 @@
Worklist.Add(LHSI);
return &ICI;
}
-
+
// Was the old condition true if the operand is positive?
bool isTrueIfPositive = ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT;
-
+
// If so, the new one isn't.
isTrueIfPositive ^= true;
-
+
if (isTrueIfPositive)
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, CompareVal,
SubOne(RHS));
@@ -1076,13 +1076,13 @@
if (LHSI->hasOneUse() && isa<ConstantInt>(LHSI->getOperand(1)) &&
LHSI->getOperand(0)->hasOneUse()) {
ConstantInt *AndCST = cast<ConstantInt>(LHSI->getOperand(1));
-
+
// If the LHS is an AND of a truncating cast, we can widen the
// and/compare to be the input width without changing the value
// produced, eliminating a cast.
if (TruncInst *Cast = dyn_cast<TruncInst>(LHSI->getOperand(0))) {
// We can do this transformation if either the AND constant does not
- // have its sign bit set or if it is an equality comparison.
+ // have its sign bit set or if it is an equality comparison.
// Extending a relational comparison when we're checking the sign
// bit would not work.
if (ICI.isEquality() ||
@@ -1119,12 +1119,12 @@
BinaryOperator *Shift = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(LHSI->getOperand(0));
if (Shift && !Shift->isShift())
Shift = 0;
-
+
ConstantInt *ShAmt;
ShAmt = Shift ? dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Shift->getOperand(1)) : 0;
Type *Ty = Shift ? Shift->getType() : 0; // Type of the shift.
Type *AndTy = AndCST->getType(); // Type of the and.
-
+
// We can fold this as long as we can't shift unknown bits
// into the mask. This can only happen with signed shift
// rights, as they sign-extend.
@@ -1135,20 +1135,20 @@
// of the bits shifted in could be tested after the mask.
uint32_t TyBits = Ty->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
int ShAmtVal = TyBits - ShAmt->getLimitedValue(TyBits);
-
+
uint32_t BitWidth = AndTy->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
- if ((APInt::getHighBitsSet(BitWidth, BitWidth-ShAmtVal) &
+ if ((APInt::getHighBitsSet(BitWidth, BitWidth-ShAmtVal) &
AndCST->getValue()) == 0)
CanFold = true;
}
-
+
if (CanFold) {
Constant *NewCst;
if (Shift->getOpcode() == Instruction::Shl)
NewCst = ConstantExpr::getLShr(RHS, ShAmt);
else
NewCst = ConstantExpr::getShl(RHS, ShAmt);
-
+
// Check to see if we are shifting out any of the bits being
// compared.
if (ConstantExpr::get(Shift->getOpcode(),
@@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@
}
}
}
-
+
// Turn ((X >> Y) & C) == 0 into (X & (C << Y)) == 0. The later is
// preferable because it allows the C<<Y expression to be hoisted out
// of a loop if Y is invariant and X is not.
@@ -1191,16 +1191,16 @@
// Insert a logical shift.
NS = Builder->CreateLShr(AndCST, Shift->getOperand(1));
}
-
+
// Compute X & (C << Y).
- Value *NewAnd =
+ Value *NewAnd =
Builder->CreateAnd(Shift->getOperand(0), NS, LHSI->getName());
-
+
ICI.setOperand(0, NewAnd);
return &ICI;
}
}
-
+
// Try to optimize things like "A[i]&42 == 0" to index computations.
if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(LHSI->getOperand(0))) {
if (GetElementPtrInst *GEP =
@@ -1235,19 +1235,19 @@
}
break;
}
-
+
case Instruction::Shl: { // (icmp pred (shl X, ShAmt), CI)
ConstantInt *ShAmt = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(LHSI->getOperand(1));
if (!ShAmt) break;
-
+
uint32_t TypeBits = RHSV.getBitWidth();
-
+
// Check that the shift amount is in range. If not, don't perform
// undefined shifts. When the shift is visited it will be
// simplified.
if (ShAmt->uge(TypeBits))
break;
-
+
if (ICI.isEquality()) {
// If we are comparing against bits always shifted out, the
// comparison cannot succeed.
@@ -1260,34 +1260,34 @@
ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(ICI.getContext()), IsICMP_NE);
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI, Cst);
}
-
+
// If the shift is NUW, then it is just shifting out zeros, no need for an
// AND.
if (cast<BinaryOperator>(LHSI)->hasNoUnsignedWrap())
return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), LHSI->getOperand(0),
ConstantExpr::getLShr(RHS, ShAmt));
-
+
if (LHSI->hasOneUse()) {
// Otherwise strength reduce the shift into an and.
uint32_t ShAmtVal = (uint32_t)ShAmt->getLimitedValue(TypeBits);
Constant *Mask =
- ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(), APInt::getLowBitsSet(TypeBits,
+ ConstantInt::get(ICI.getContext(), APInt::getLowBitsSet(TypeBits,
TypeBits-ShAmtVal));
-
+
Value *And =
Builder->CreateAnd(LHSI->getOperand(0),Mask, LHSI->getName()+".mask");
return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), And,
ConstantExpr::getLShr(RHS, ShAmt));
}
}
-
+
// Otherwise, if this is a comparison of the sign bit, simplify to and/test.
bool TrueIfSigned = false;
if (LHSI->hasOneUse() &&
isSignBitCheck(ICI.getPredicate(), RHS, TrueIfSigned)) {
// (X << 31) <s 0 --> (X&1) != 0
Constant *Mask = ConstantInt::get(LHSI->getOperand(0)->getType(),
- APInt::getOneBitSet(TypeBits,
+ APInt::getOneBitSet(TypeBits,
TypeBits-ShAmt->getZExtValue()-1));
Value *And =
Builder->CreateAnd(LHSI->getOperand(0), Mask, LHSI->getName()+".mask");
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@
}
break;
}
-
+
case Instruction::LShr: // (icmp pred (shr X, ShAmt), CI)
case Instruction::AShr: {
// Handle equality comparisons of shift-by-constant.
@@ -1313,13 +1313,13 @@
}
break;
}
-
+
case Instruction::SDiv:
case Instruction::UDiv:
// Fold: icmp pred ([us]div X, C1), C2 -> range test
- // Fold this div into the comparison, producing a range check.
- // Determine, based on the divide type, what the range is being
- // checked. If there is an overflow on the low or high side, remember
+ // Fold this div into the comparison, producing a range check.
+ // Determine, based on the divide type, what the range is being
+ // checked. If there is an overflow on the low or high side, remember
// it, otherwise compute the range [low, hi) bounding the new value.
// See: InsertRangeTest above for the kinds of replacements possible.
if (ConstantInt *DivRHS = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(LHSI->getOperand(1)))
@@ -1358,12 +1358,12 @@
}
break;
}
-
+
// Simplify icmp_eq and icmp_ne instructions with integer constant RHS.
if (ICI.isEquality()) {
bool isICMP_NE = ICI.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE;
-
- // If the first operand is (add|sub|and|or|xor|rem) with a constant, and
+
+ // If the first operand is (add|sub|and|or|xor|rem) with a constant, and
// the second operand is a constant, simplify a bit.
if (BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(LHSI)) {
switch (BO->getOpcode()) {
@@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@
// Replace ((add A, B) != 0) with (A != -B) if A or B is
// efficiently invertible, or if the add has just this one use.
Value *BOp0 = BO->getOperand(0), *BOp1 = BO->getOperand(1);
-
+
if (Value *NegVal = dyn_castNegVal(BOp1))
return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), BOp0, NegVal);
if (Value *NegVal = dyn_castNegVal(BOp0))
@@ -1433,11 +1433,11 @@
Constant *NotCI = ConstantExpr::getNot(RHS);
if (!ConstantExpr::getAnd(BOC, NotCI)->isNullValue())
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI,
- ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(ICI.getContext()),
+ ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(ICI.getContext()),
isICMP_NE));
}
break;
-
+
case Instruction::And:
if (ConstantInt *BOC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BO->getOperand(1))) {
// If bits are being compared against that are and'd out, then the
@@ -1446,7 +1446,7 @@
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(ICI,
ConstantInt::get(Type::getInt1Ty(ICI.getContext()),
isICMP_NE));
-
+
// If we have ((X & C) == C), turn it into ((X & C) != 0).
if (RHS == BOC && RHSV.isPowerOf2())
return new ICmpInst(isICMP_NE ? ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ :
@@ -1461,16 +1461,16 @@
if (BOC->getValue().isSignBit()) {
Value *X = BO->getOperand(0);
Constant *Zero = Constant::getNullValue(X->getType());
- ICmpInst::Predicate pred = isICMP_NE ?
+ ICmpInst::Predicate pred = isICMP_NE ?
ICmpInst::ICMP_SLT : ICmpInst::ICMP_SGE;
return new ICmpInst(pred, X, Zero);
}
-
+
// ((X & ~7) == 0) --> X < 8
if (RHSV == 0 && isHighOnes(BOC)) {
Value *X = BO->getOperand(0);
Constant *NegX = ConstantExpr::getNeg(BOC);
- ICmpInst::Predicate pred = isICMP_NE ?
+ ICmpInst::Predicate pred = isICMP_NE ?
ICmpInst::ICMP_UGE : ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT;
return new ICmpInst(pred, X, NegX);
}
@@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@
Type *DestTy = LHSCI->getType();
Value *RHSCIOp;
- // Turn icmp (ptrtoint x), (ptrtoint/c) into a compare of the input if the
+ // Turn icmp (ptrtoint x), (ptrtoint/c) into a compare of the input if the
// integer type is the same size as the pointer type.
if (TD && LHSCI->getOpcode() == Instruction::PtrToInt &&
TD->getPointerSizeInBits() ==
@@ -1540,7 +1540,7 @@
if (RHSOp)
return new ICmpInst(ICI.getPredicate(), LHSCIOp, RHSOp);
}
-
+
// The code below only handles extension cast instructions, so far.
// Enforce this.
if (LHSCI->getOpcode() != Instruction::ZExt &&
@@ -1553,9 +1553,9 @@
if (CastInst *CI = dyn_cast<CastInst>(ICI.getOperand(1))) {
// Not an extension from the same type?
RHSCIOp = CI->getOperand(0);
- if (RHSCIOp->getType() != LHSCIOp->getType())
+ if (RHSCIOp->getType() != LHSCIOp->getType())
return 0;
-
+
// If the signedness of the two casts doesn't agree (i.e. one is a sext
// and the other is a zext), then we can't handle this.
if (CI->getOpcode() != LHSCI->getOpcode())
@@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@
return new ICmpInst(ICI.getUnsignedPredicate(), LHSCIOp, Res1);
}
- // The re-extended constant changed so the constant cannot be represented
+ // The re-extended constant changed so the constant cannot be represented
// in the shorter type. Consequently, we cannot emit a simple comparison.
// All the cases that fold to true or false will have already been handled
// by SimplifyICmpInst, so only deal with the tricky case.
@@ -1638,26 +1638,26 @@
// llvm.sadd.with.overflow. To do this, we have to replace the original add
// with a narrower add, and discard the add-with-constant that is part of the
// range check (if we can't eliminate it, this isn't profitable).
-
+
// In order to eliminate the add-with-constant, the compare can be its only
// use.
Instruction *AddWithCst = cast<Instruction>(I.getOperand(0));
if (!AddWithCst->hasOneUse()) return 0;
-
+
// If CI2 is 2^7, 2^15, 2^31, then it might be an sadd.with.overflow.
if (!CI2->getValue().isPowerOf2()) return 0;
unsigned NewWidth = CI2->getValue().countTrailingZeros();
if (NewWidth != 7 && NewWidth != 15 && NewWidth != 31) return 0;
-
+
// The width of the new add formed is 1 more than the bias.
++NewWidth;
-
+
// Check to see that CI1 is an all-ones value with NewWidth bits.
if (CI1->getBitWidth() == NewWidth ||
CI1->getValue() != APInt::getLowBitsSet(CI1->getBitWidth(), NewWidth))
return 0;
-
- // In order to replace the original add with a narrower
+
+ // In order to replace the original add with a narrower
// llvm.sadd.with.overflow, the only uses allowed are the add-with-constant
// and truncates that discard the high bits of the add. Verify that this is
// the case.
@@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@
for (Value::use_iterator UI = OrigAdd->use_begin(), E = OrigAdd->use_end();
UI != E; ++UI) {
if (*UI == AddWithCst) continue;
-
+
// Only accept truncates for now. We would really like a nice recursive
// predicate like SimplifyDemandedBits, but which goes downwards the use-def
// chain to see which bits of a value are actually demanded. If the
@@ -1675,32 +1675,32 @@
if (TI == 0 ||
TI->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() > NewWidth) return 0;
}
-
+
// If the pattern matches, truncate the inputs to the narrower type and
// use the sadd_with_overflow intrinsic to efficiently compute both the
// result and the overflow bit.
Module *M = I.getParent()->getParent()->getParent();
-
+
Type *NewType = IntegerType::get(OrigAdd->getContext(), NewWidth);
Value *F = Intrinsic::getDeclaration(M, Intrinsic::sadd_with_overflow,
NewType);
InstCombiner::BuilderTy *Builder = IC.Builder;
-
+
// Put the new code above the original add, in case there are any uses of the
// add between the add and the compare.
Builder->SetInsertPoint(OrigAdd);
-
+
Value *TruncA = Builder->CreateTrunc(A, NewType, A->getName()+".trunc");
Value *TruncB = Builder->CreateTrunc(B, NewType, B->getName()+".trunc");
CallInst *Call = Builder->CreateCall2(F, TruncA, TruncB, "sadd");
Value *Add = Builder->CreateExtractValue(Call, 0, "sadd.result");
Value *ZExt = Builder->CreateZExt(Add, OrigAdd->getType());
-
+
// The inner add was the result of the narrow add, zero extended to the
// wider type. Replace it with the result computed by the intrinsic.
IC.ReplaceInstUsesWith(*OrigAdd, ZExt);
-
+
// The original icmp gets replaced with the overflow value.
return ExtractValueInst::Create(Call, 1, "sadd.overflow");
}
@@ -1710,13 +1710,13 @@
// Don't bother doing this transformation for pointers, don't do it for
// vectors.
if (!isa<IntegerType>(OrigAddV->getType())) return 0;
-
+
// If the add is a constant expr, then we don't bother transforming it.
Instruction *OrigAdd = dyn_cast<Instruction>(OrigAddV);
if (OrigAdd == 0) return 0;
-
+
Value *LHS = OrigAdd->getOperand(0), *RHS = OrigAdd->getOperand(1);
-
+
// Put the new code above the original add, in case there are any uses of the
// add between the add and the compare.
InstCombiner::BuilderTy *Builder = IC.Builder;
@@ -1741,13 +1741,13 @@
unsigned BitWidth, bool isSignCheck) {
if (isSignCheck)
return APInt::getSignBit(BitWidth);
-
+
ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(I.getOperand(1));
if (!CI) return APInt::getAllOnesValue(BitWidth);
const APInt &RHS = CI->getValue();
-
+
switch (I.getPredicate()) {
- // For a UGT comparison, we don't care about any bits that
+ // For a UGT comparison, we don't care about any bits that
// correspond to the trailing ones of the comparand. The value of these
// bits doesn't impact the outcome of the comparison, because any value
// greater than the RHS must differ in a bit higher than these due to carry.
@@ -1756,7 +1756,7 @@
APInt lowBitsSet = APInt::getLowBitsSet(BitWidth, trailingOnes);
return ~lowBitsSet;
}
-
+
// Similarly, for a ULT comparison, we don't care about the trailing zeros.
// Any value less than the RHS must differ in a higher bit because of carries.
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT: {
@@ -1764,17 +1764,17 @@
APInt lowBitsSet = APInt::getLowBitsSet(BitWidth, trailingZeros);
return ~lowBitsSet;
}
-
+
default:
return APInt::getAllOnesValue(BitWidth);
}
-
+
}
Instruction *InstCombiner::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst &I) {
bool Changed = false;
Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0), *Op1 = I.getOperand(1);
-
+
/// Orders the operands of the compare so that they are listed from most
/// complex to least complex. This puts constants before unary operators,
/// before binary operators.
@@ -1783,10 +1783,10 @@
std::swap(Op0, Op1);
Changed = true;
}
-
+
if (Value *V = SimplifyICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), Op0, Op1, TD))
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, V);
-
+
Type *Ty = Op0->getType();
// icmp's with boolean values can always be turned into bitwise operations
@@ -1836,13 +1836,13 @@
BitWidth = Ty->getScalarSizeInBits();
else if (TD) // Pointers require TD info to get their size.
BitWidth = TD->getTypeSizeInBits(Ty->getScalarType());
-
+
bool isSignBit = false;
// See if we are doing a comparison with a constant.
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1)) {
Value *A = 0, *B = 0;
-
+
// Match the following pattern, which is a common idiom when writing
// overflow-safe integer arithmetic function. The source performs an
// addition in wider type, and explicitly checks for overflow using
@@ -1850,9 +1850,9 @@
// sadd_with_overflow intrinsic.
//
// TODO: This could probably be generalized to handle other overflow-safe
- // operations if we worked out the formulas to compute the appropriate
+ // operations if we worked out the formulas to compute the appropriate
// magic constants.
- //
+ //
// sum = a + b
// if (sum+128 >u 255) ... -> llvm.sadd.with.overflow.i8
{
@@ -1862,14 +1862,14 @@
if (Instruction *Res = ProcessUGT_ADDCST_ADD(I, A, B, CI2, CI, *this))
return Res;
}
-
+
// (icmp ne/eq (sub A B) 0) -> (icmp ne/eq A, B)
if (I.isEquality() && CI->isZero() &&
match(Op0, m_Sub(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)))) {
// (icmp cond A B) if cond is equality
return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), A, B);
}
-
+
// If we have an icmp le or icmp ge instruction, turn it into the
// appropriate icmp lt or icmp gt instruction. This allows us to rely on
// them being folded in the code below. The SimplifyICmpInst code has
@@ -1893,7 +1893,7 @@
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_SGT, Op0,
ConstantInt::get(CI->getContext(), CI->getValue()-1));
}
-
+
// If this comparison is a normal comparison, it demands all
// bits, if it is a sign bit comparison, it only demands the sign bit.
bool UnusedBit;
@@ -1949,7 +1949,7 @@
case ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ: {
if (Op0Max.ult(Op1Min) || Op0Min.ugt(Op1Max))
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getType()));
-
+
// If all bits are known zero except for one, then we know at most one
// bit is set. If the comparison is against zero, then this is a check
// to see if *that* bit is set.
@@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@
if (!match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(LHS), m_ConstantInt(LHSC))) ||
LHSC->getValue() != Op0KnownZeroInverted)
LHS = Op0;
-
+
// If the LHS is 1 << x, and we know the result is a power of 2 like 8,
// then turn "((1 << x)&8) == 0" into "x != 3".
Value *X = 0;
@@ -1970,7 +1970,7 @@
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_NE, X,
ConstantInt::get(X->getType(), CmpVal));
}
-
+
// If the LHS is 8 >>u x, and we know the result is a power of 2 like 1,
// then turn "((8 >>u x)&1) == 0" into "x != 3".
const APInt *CI;
@@ -1980,13 +1980,13 @@
ConstantInt::get(X->getType(),
CI->countTrailingZeros()));
}
-
+
break;
}
case ICmpInst::ICMP_NE: {
if (Op0Max.ult(Op1Min) || Op0Min.ugt(Op1Max))
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getTrue(I.getType()));
-
+
// If all bits are known zero except for one, then we know at most one
// bit is set. If the comparison is against zero, then this is a check
// to see if *that* bit is set.
@@ -1998,7 +1998,7 @@
if (!match(Op0, m_And(m_Value(LHS), m_ConstantInt(LHSC))) ||
LHSC->getValue() != Op0KnownZeroInverted)
LHS = Op0;
-
+
// If the LHS is 1 << x, and we know the result is a power of 2 like 8,
// then turn "((1 << x)&8) != 0" into "x == 3".
Value *X = 0;
@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@
return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ, X,
ConstantInt::get(X->getType(), CmpVal));
}
-
+
// If the LHS is 8 >>u x, and we know the result is a power of 2 like 1,
// then turn "((8 >>u x)&1) != 0" into "x == 3".
const APInt *CI;
@@ -2017,7 +2017,7 @@
ConstantInt::get(X->getType(),
CI->countTrailingZeros()));
}
-
+
break;
}
case ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT:
@@ -2138,9 +2138,9 @@
// See if we are doing a comparison between a constant and an instruction that
// can be folded into the comparison.
if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Op1)) {
- // Since the RHS is a ConstantInt (CI), if the left hand side is an
- // instruction, see if that instruction also has constants so that the
- // instruction can be folded into the icmp
+ // Since the RHS is a ConstantInt (CI), if the left hand side is an
+ // instruction, see if that instruction also has constants so that the
+ // instruction can be folded into the icmp
if (Instruction *LHSI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Op0))
if (Instruction *Res = visitICmpInstWithInstAndIntCst(I, LHSI, CI))
return Res;
@@ -2195,7 +2195,7 @@
case Instruction::IntToPtr:
// icmp pred inttoptr(X), null -> icmp pred X, 0
if (RHSC->isNullValue() && TD &&
- TD->getIntPtrType(RHSC->getContext()) ==
+ TD->getIntPtrType(RHSC->getContext()) ==
LHSI->getOperand(0)->getType())
return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), LHSI->getOperand(0),
Constant::getNullValue(LHSI->getOperand(0)->getType()));
@@ -2228,8 +2228,8 @@
// values. If the ptr->ptr cast can be stripped off both arguments, we do so
// now.
if (BitCastInst *CI = dyn_cast<BitCastInst>(Op0)) {
- if (Op0->getType()->isPointerTy() &&
- (isa<Constant>(Op1) || isa<BitCastInst>(Op1))) {
+ if (Op0->getType()->isPointerTy() &&
+ (isa<Constant>(Op1) || isa<BitCastInst>(Op1))) {
// We keep moving the cast from the left operand over to the right
// operand, where it can often be eliminated completely.
Op0 = CI->getOperand(0);
@@ -2251,7 +2251,7 @@
return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), Op0, Op1);
}
}
-
+
if (isa<CastInst>(Op0)) {
// Handle the special case of: icmp (cast bool to X), <cst>
// This comes up when you have code like
@@ -2385,7 +2385,7 @@
return new ICmpInst(Pred, BO0->getOperand(0),
BO1->getOperand(0));
}
-
+
if (CI->isMaxValue(true)) {
ICmpInst::Predicate Pred = I.isSigned()
? I.getUnsignedPredicate()
@@ -2405,7 +2405,7 @@
// Mask = -1 >> count-trailing-zeros(Cst).
if (!CI->isZero() && !CI->isOne()) {
const APInt &AP = CI->getValue();
- ConstantInt *Mask = ConstantInt::get(I.getContext(),
+ ConstantInt *Mask = ConstantInt::get(I.getContext(),
APInt::getLowBitsSet(AP.getBitWidth(),
AP.getBitWidth() -
AP.countTrailingZeros()));
@@ -2439,7 +2439,7 @@
}
}
}
-
+
{ Value *A, *B;
// ~x < ~y --> y < x
// ~x < cst --> ~cst < x
@@ -2453,11 +2453,11 @@
// (a+b) <u a --> llvm.uadd.with.overflow.
// (a+b) <u b --> llvm.uadd.with.overflow.
if (I.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_ULT &&
- match(Op0, m_Add(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
+ match(Op0, m_Add(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
(Op1 == A || Op1 == B))
if (Instruction *R = ProcessUAddIdiom(I, Op0, *this))
return R;
-
+
// a >u (a+b) --> llvm.uadd.with.overflow.
// b >u (a+b) --> llvm.uadd.with.overflow.
if (I.getPredicate() == ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT &&
@@ -2466,7 +2466,7 @@
if (Instruction *R = ProcessUAddIdiom(I, Op1, *this))
return R;
}
-
+
if (I.isEquality()) {
Value *A, *B, *C, *D;
@@ -2487,7 +2487,7 @@
Value *Xor = Builder->CreateXor(C, NC);
return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), A, Xor);
}
-
+
// A^B == A^D -> B == D
if (A == C) return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), B, D);
if (A == D) return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), B, C);
@@ -2495,7 +2495,7 @@
if (B == D) return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), A, C);
}
}
-
+
if (match(Op1, m_Xor(m_Value(A), m_Value(B))) &&
(A == Op0 || B == Op0)) {
// A == (A^B) -> B == 0
@@ -2505,10 +2505,10 @@
}
// (X&Z) == (Y&Z) -> (X^Y) & Z == 0
- if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)))) &&
+ if (match(Op0, m_OneUse(m_And(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)))) &&
match(Op1, m_OneUse(m_And(m_Value(C), m_Value(D))))) {
Value *X = 0, *Y = 0, *Z = 0;
-
+
if (A == C) {
X = B; Y = D; Z = A;
} else if (A == D) {
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@
} else if (B == D) {
X = A; Y = C; Z = B;
}
-
+
if (X) { // Build (X^Y) & Z
Op1 = Builder->CreateXor(X, Y);
Op1 = Builder->CreateAnd(Op1, Z);
@@ -2527,7 +2527,7 @@
return &I;
}
}
-
+
// Transform "icmp eq (trunc (lshr(X, cst1)), cst" to
// "icmp (and X, mask), cst"
uint64_t ShAmt = 0;
@@ -2540,21 +2540,21 @@
// when it exposes other optimizations.
!A->hasOneUse()) {
unsigned ASize =cast<IntegerType>(A->getType())->getPrimitiveSizeInBits();
-
+
if (ShAmt < ASize) {
APInt MaskV =
APInt::getLowBitsSet(ASize, Op0->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits());
MaskV <<= ShAmt;
-
+
APInt CmpV = Cst1->getValue().zext(ASize);
CmpV <<= ShAmt;
-
+
Value *Mask = Builder->CreateAnd(A, Builder->getInt(MaskV));
return new ICmpInst(I.getPredicate(), Mask, Builder->getInt(CmpV));
}
}
}
-
+
{
Value *X; ConstantInt *Cst;
// icmp X+Cst, X
@@ -2580,31 +2580,31 @@
Constant *RHSC) {
if (!isa<ConstantFP>(RHSC)) return 0;
const APFloat &RHS = cast<ConstantFP>(RHSC)->getValueAPF();
-
+
// Get the width of the mantissa. We don't want to hack on conversions that
// might lose information from the integer, e.g. "i64 -> float"
int MantissaWidth = LHSI->getType()->getFPMantissaWidth();
if (MantissaWidth == -1) return 0; // Unknown.
-
+
// Check to see that the input is converted from an integer type that is small
// enough that preserves all bits. TODO: check here for "known" sign bits.
// This would allow us to handle (fptosi (x >>s 62) to float) if x is i64 f.e.
unsigned InputSize = LHSI->getOperand(0)->getType()->getScalarSizeInBits();
-
+
// If this is a uitofp instruction, we need an extra bit to hold the sign.
bool LHSUnsigned = isa<UIToFPInst>(LHSI);
if (LHSUnsigned)
++InputSize;
-
+
// If the conversion would lose info, don't hack on this.
if ((int)InputSize > MantissaWidth)
return 0;
-
+
// Otherwise, we can potentially simplify the comparison. We know that it
// will always come through as an integer value and we know the constant is
// not a NAN (it would have been previously simplified).
assert(!RHS.isNaN() && "NaN comparison not already folded!");
-
+
ICmpInst::Predicate Pred;
switch (I.getPredicate()) {
default: llvm_unreachable("Unexpected predicate!");
@@ -2637,15 +2637,15 @@
case FCmpInst::FCMP_UNO:
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));
}
-
+
IntegerType *IntTy = cast<IntegerType>(LHSI->getOperand(0)->getType());
-
+
// Now we know that the APFloat is a normal number, zero or inf.
-
+
// See if the FP constant is too large for the integer. For example,
// comparing an i8 to 300.0.
unsigned IntWidth = IntTy->getScalarSizeInBits();
-
+
if (!LHSUnsigned) {
// If the RHS value is > SignedMax, fold the comparison. This handles +INF
// and large values.
@@ -2671,7 +2671,7 @@
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, ConstantInt::getFalse(I.getContext()));
}
}
-
+
if (!LHSUnsigned) {
// See if the RHS value is < SignedMin.
APFloat SMin(RHS.getSemantics(), APFloat::fcZero, false);
@@ -2767,7 +2767,7 @@
Instruction *InstCombiner::visitFCmpInst(FCmpInst &I) {
bool Changed = false;
-
+
/// Orders the operands of the compare so that they are listed from most
/// complex to least complex. This puts constants before unary operators,
/// before binary operators.
@@ -2777,7 +2777,7 @@
}
Value *Op0 = I.getOperand(0), *Op1 = I.getOperand(1);
-
+
if (Value *V = SimplifyFCmpInst(I.getPredicate(), Op0, Op1, TD))
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, V);
@@ -2793,7 +2793,7 @@
I.setPredicate(FCmpInst::FCMP_UNO);
I.setOperand(1, Constant::getNullValue(Op0->getType()));
return &I;
-
+
case FCmpInst::FCMP_ORD: // True if ordered (no nans)
case FCmpInst::FCMP_OEQ: // True if ordered and equal
case FCmpInst::FCMP_OGE: // True if ordered and greater than or equal
@@ -2804,7 +2804,7 @@
return &I;
}
}
-
+
// Handle fcmp with constant RHS
if (Constant *RHSC = dyn_cast<Constant>(Op1)) {
if (Instruction *LHSI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(Op0))
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list