[llvm-commits] [llvm] r140210 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp test/Transforms/SCCP/ipsccp-basic.ll
Eli Friedman
eli.friedman at gmail.com
Tue Sep 20 16:28:51 PDT 2011
Author: efriedma
Date: Tue Sep 20 18:28:51 2011
New Revision: 140210
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=140210&view=rev
Log:
Make sure IPSCCP never marks a tracked call as overdefined in SCCPSolver::ResolvedUndefsIn. If we do, we can end up in a situation where a function is resolved to return a constant, but the caller is marked overdefined, which confuses the code later.
<rdar://problem/9956541> (again).
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SCCP/ipsccp-basic.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp?rev=140210&r1=140209&r2=140210&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp Tue Sep 20 18:28:51 2011
@@ -1433,15 +1433,25 @@
if (I->getType()->isVoidTy()) continue;
if (StructType *STy = dyn_cast<StructType>(I->getType())) {
- // Only a few things that can be structs matter for undef. Just send
- // all their results to overdefined. We could be more precise than this
- // but it isn't worth bothering.
- if (!isa<ExtractValueInst>(I) && !isa<InsertValueInst>(I)) {
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = STy->getNumElements(); i != e; ++i) {
- LatticeVal &LV = getStructValueState(I, i);
- if (LV.isUndefined())
- markOverdefined(LV, I);
- }
+ // Only a few things that can be structs matter for undef.
+
+ // Tracked calls must never be marked overdefined in ResolvedUndefsIn.
+ if (CallSite CS = CallSite(I))
+ if (Function *F = CS.getCalledFunction())
+ if (MRVFunctionsTracked.count(F))
+ continue;
+
+ // extractvalue and insertvalue don't need to be marked; they are
+ // tracked as precisely as their operands.
+ if (isa<ExtractValueInst>(I) || isa<InsertValueInst>(I))
+ continue;
+
+ // Send the results of everything else to overdefined. We could be
+ // more precise than this but it isn't worth bothering.
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = STy->getNumElements(); i != e; ++i) {
+ LatticeVal &LV = getStructValueState(I, i);
+ if (LV.isUndefined())
+ markOverdefined(LV, I);
}
continue;
}
@@ -1594,6 +1604,22 @@
break;
markOverdefined(I);
return true;
+ case Instruction::Call:
+ case Instruction::Invoke: {
+ // There are two reasons a call can have an undef result
+ // 1. It could be tracked.
+ // 2. It could be constant-foldable.
+ // Because of the way we solve return values, tracked calls must
+ // never be marked overdefined in ResolvedUndefsIn.
+ if (Function *F = CallSite(I).getCalledFunction())
+ if (TrackedRetVals.count(F))
+ break;
+
+ // If the call is constant-foldable, we mark it overdefined because
+ // we do not know what return values are valid.
+ markOverdefined(I);
+ return true;
+ }
default:
// If we don't know what should happen here, conservatively mark it
// overdefined.
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SCCP/ipsccp-basic.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SCCP/ipsccp-basic.ll?rev=140210&r1=140209&r2=140210&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SCCP/ipsccp-basic.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SCCP/ipsccp-basic.ll Tue Sep 20 18:28:51 2011
@@ -209,3 +209,21 @@
}
declare i32 @__gxx_personality_v0(...)
+
+;;======================== test10
+
+define i32 @test10a() nounwind {
+entry:
+ %call = call i32 @test10b(i32 undef)
+ ret i32 %call
+; CHECK: define i32 @test10a
+; CHECK: ret i32 0
+}
+
+define internal i32 @test10b(i32 %x) nounwind {
+entry:
+ %r = and i32 %x, 1
+ ret i32 %r
+; CHECK: define internal i32 @test10b
+; CHECK: ret i32 undef
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list