[llvm-commits] r133708 strikes me again? - the case clang stalls
Jay Foad
jay.foad at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 03:44:23 PDT 2011
On 9 August 2011 11:40, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 August 2011 06:58, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote:
>> I think your patch to LLVM is a good idea; replaceAllUsesWith should
>> not be assuming a fully-formed AST. As a slight optimization, I would
>> suggest doing this instead:
>> if (Succ->empty()) continue;
>> Jay, does that seem reasonable?
>
> Sure, I'm fine with either your or Takumi's fix. Thanks for taking the
> time to investigate.
Hang on... if we need to cope with half-baked IR, won't your fix still
fall over on a BB that contains some phi nodes but nothing else?
Jay.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list