[llvm-commits] [llvm] r133063 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/CodeGen/ScheduleDAG.h lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAG.cpp lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGRRList.cpp lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGSDNodes.cpp test/CodeGen/X86/2011-06-14-PreschedRega

Francois Pichet pichet2000 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 24 18:17:07 PDT 2011


This is sad, I recently took the habit of running the llvm tests at
least once a day on Windows (MSVC 2010) and this test is the only one
that constantly fails. I run them in in Release because a Debug run
takes forever and there is no Release+Assert on Windows.

Just saying....

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
> Self review: This test will fail in the no-Asserts build because -stress-sched is unavailable. It seems that llvm-lit always picks up the Asserts build. But is there some formal way to indicate that the test should not be run unless built with Asserts?
>
> -Andy
>
> On Jun 15, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Andrew Trick wrote:
>
>> Author: atrick
>> Date: Wed Jun 15 12:16:12 2011
>> New Revision: 133063
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=133063&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Added -stress-sched flag in the Asserts build.
>> Added a test case for handling physreg aliases during pre-RA-sched.
>>
>> Added:
>>    llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/2011-06-14-PreschedRegalias.ll
>> Modified:
>>    llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CodeGen/ScheduleDAG.h
>>    llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAG.cpp
>>    llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGRRList.cpp
>>    llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ScheduleDAGSDNodes.cpp
>>




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list