[llvm-commits] [patch] Change how we handle mandatory unwind tables

Renato Golin rengolin at systemcall.org
Tue May 24 17:59:10 PDT 2011


On 24 May 2011 20:19, Rafael Avila de Espindola
<rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah. The reason I think we don't need the third one is that the user not
> stating his preference just falls back to the ABI. That is, on x86, the
> following two commands are equivalent

I agree, there's no point in requesting to generate tables when the
ABI doesn't even use them.

Generating the unwind tables for debug purposes is a completely
different problem and still, could be interpreted as an ABI request to
display them (so, using ehframes).

cheers,
--renato



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list