[llvm-commits] [patch] Change how we handle mandatory unwind tables

[Duncan Sands]

> I am walking to work but it is at
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110523/121283.html

Thanks Rafael.  Since your patches don't modify prune-eh, I guess that answers
my question :)

Ciao, Duncan.

>
> The table I posted in reply to Renato's email should help too.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
> On May 24, 2011 10:11 AM, "Duncan Sands" <baldrick at free.fr
> <mailto:baldrick at free.fr>> wrote:
>  > Hi Rafael,
>  >
>  >>>> The change to prune-eh also removes some optimization opportunities.
>  >>>> Preventing adding nounwind can prevent converting an invoke to a call.
>  >>>
>  >>> I'm confused. What has prune-eh got to do with unwind-tables?
>  >>
>  >> It adds the nounwind attribute.
>  >
>  > now I'm even more confused, but perhaps that's because I lost your patch.
>  > Can you please send me a copy.
>  >
>  > Thanks, Duncan.
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > llvm-commits mailing list
>  > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
>  > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits