[llvm-commits] [patch] Change how we handle mandatory unwind tables

[Renato Golin]

2011/5/23 Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>:
> Adding this to TargetData is a bit strange, but I am not sure where else
> to put it.

The first thing I thought when reading until here was to add another
function attribute...


> The prune-eh issue can be fixed by adding a new attribute, noehframe.
> With the new attribute nounwind would keep its current meaning of "no
> exception will unwind past this" and noehframe would be the more strict
> "nothing (debuggers, profilers) will try to unwind past this".

Which is what you propose here...

Doesn't that fix the whole problem without the need to add bits to TargetData?

cheers,
--renato