[llvm-commits] [llvm] r131673 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
Devang Patel
dpatel at apple.com
Thu May 19 13:52:46 PDT 2011
Author: dpatel
Date: Thu May 19 15:52:46 2011
New Revision: 131673
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=131673&view=rev
Log:
Reapply r131605. This time with a fix, which is to use NoFolder.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp?rev=131673&r1=131672&r2=131673&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp Thu May 19 15:52:46 2011
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
#include "llvm/Support/ConstantRange.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/IRBuilder.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/NoFolder.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include <algorithm>
#include <set>
@@ -908,6 +909,7 @@
NT->takeName(I1);
}
+ IRBuilder<true, NoFolder> Builder(NT);
// Hoisting one of the terminators from our successor is a great thing.
// Unfortunately, the successors of the if/else blocks may have PHI nodes in
// them. If they do, all PHI entries for BB1/BB2 must agree for all PHI
@@ -924,11 +926,11 @@
// These values do not agree. Insert a select instruction before NT
// that determines the right value.
SelectInst *&SI = InsertedSelects[std::make_pair(BB1V, BB2V)];
- if (SI == 0) {
- SI = SelectInst::Create(BI->getCondition(), BB1V, BB2V,
- BB1V->getName()+"."+BB2V->getName(), NT);
- SI->setDebugLoc(BI->getDebugLoc());
- }
+ if (SI == 0)
+ SI = cast<SelectInst>
+ (Builder.CreateSelect(BI->getCondition(), BB1V, BB2V,
+ BB1V->getName()+"."+BB2V->getName()));
+
// Make the PHI node use the select for all incoming values for BB1/BB2
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
if (PN->getIncomingBlock(i) == BB1 || PN->getIncomingBlock(i) == BB2)
@@ -1086,14 +1088,16 @@
// Create a select whose true value is the speculatively executed value and
// false value is the previously determined FalseV.
+ IRBuilder<true, NoFolder> Builder(BI);
SelectInst *SI;
if (Invert)
- SI = SelectInst::Create(BrCond, FalseV, HInst,
- FalseV->getName() + "." + HInst->getName(), BI);
+ SI = cast<SelectInst>
+ (Builder.CreateSelect(BrCond, FalseV, HInst,
+ FalseV->getName() + "." + HInst->getName()));
else
- SI = SelectInst::Create(BrCond, HInst, FalseV,
- HInst->getName() + "." + FalseV->getName(), BI);
- SI->setDebugLoc(BI->getDebugLoc());
+ SI = cast<SelectInst>
+ (Builder.CreateSelect(BrCond, HInst, FalseV,
+ HInst->getName() + "." + FalseV->getName()));
// Make the PHI node use the select for all incoming values for "then" and
// "if" blocks.
@@ -1232,8 +1236,7 @@
/// FoldTwoEntryPHINode - Given a BB that starts with the specified two-entry
/// PHI node, see if we can eliminate it.
-static bool FoldTwoEntryPHINode(PHINode *PN, const TargetData *TD,
- IRBuilder<> &Builder) {
+static bool FoldTwoEntryPHINode(PHINode *PN, const TargetData *TD) {
// Ok, this is a two entry PHI node. Check to see if this is a simple "if
// statement", which has a very simple dominance structure. Basically, we
// are trying to find the condition that is being branched on, which
@@ -1332,7 +1335,7 @@
// If we can still promote the PHI nodes after this gauntlet of tests,
// do all of the PHI's now.
Instruction *InsertPt = DomBlock->getTerminator();
- Builder.SetInsertPoint(InsertPt);
+ IRBuilder<true, NoFolder> Builder(InsertPt);
// Move all 'aggressive' instructions, which are defined in the
// conditional parts of the if's up to the dominating block.
@@ -1460,6 +1463,7 @@
/// the predecessor and use logical operations to pick the right destination.
bool llvm::FoldBranchToCommonDest(BranchInst *BI) {
BasicBlock *BB = BI->getParent();
+
Instruction *Cond = dyn_cast<Instruction>(BI->getCondition());
if (Cond == 0 || (!isa<CmpInst>(Cond) && !isa<BinaryOperator>(Cond)) ||
Cond->getParent() != BB || !Cond->hasOneUse())
@@ -1580,7 +1584,8 @@
}
DEBUG(dbgs() << "FOLDING BRANCH TO COMMON DEST:\n" << *PBI << *BB);
-
+ IRBuilder<> Builder(PBI);
+
// If we need to invert the condition in the pred block to match, do so now.
if (InvertPredCond) {
Value *NewCond = PBI->getCondition();
@@ -1589,8 +1594,8 @@
CmpInst *CI = cast<CmpInst>(NewCond);
CI->setPredicate(CI->getInversePredicate());
} else {
- NewCond = BinaryOperator::CreateNot(NewCond,
- PBI->getCondition()->getName()+".not", PBI);
+ NewCond = Builder.CreateNot(NewCond,
+ PBI->getCondition()->getName()+".not");
}
PBI->setCondition(NewCond);
@@ -1617,9 +1622,9 @@
New->takeName(Cond);
Cond->setName(New->getName()+".old");
- Instruction *NewCond = BinaryOperator::Create(Opc, PBI->getCondition(),
- New, "or.cond", PBI);
- NewCond->setDebugLoc(PBI->getDebugLoc());
+ Instruction *NewCond =
+ cast<Instruction>(Builder.CreateBinOp(Opc, PBI->getCondition(),
+ New, "or.cond"));
PBI->setCondition(NewCond);
if (PBI->getSuccessor(0) == BB) {
AddPredecessorToBlock(TrueDest, PredBlock, BB);
@@ -1762,23 +1767,22 @@
}
DEBUG(dbgs() << *PBI->getParent()->getParent());
-
+
// BI may have other predecessors. Because of this, we leave
// it alone, but modify PBI.
// Make sure we get to CommonDest on True&True directions.
Value *PBICond = PBI->getCondition();
+ IRBuilder<true, NoFolder> Builder(PBI);
if (PBIOp)
- PBICond = BinaryOperator::CreateNot(PBICond,
- PBICond->getName()+".not",
- PBI);
+ PBICond = Builder.CreateNot(PBICond, PBICond->getName()+".not");
+
Value *BICond = BI->getCondition();
if (BIOp)
- BICond = BinaryOperator::CreateNot(BICond,
- BICond->getName()+".not",
- PBI);
+ BICond = Builder.CreateNot(BICond, BICond->getName()+".not");
+
// Merge the conditions.
- Value *Cond = BinaryOperator::CreateOr(PBICond, BICond, "brmerge", PBI);
+ Value *Cond = Builder.CreateOr(PBICond, BICond, "brmerge");
// Modify PBI to branch on the new condition to the new dests.
PBI->setCondition(Cond);
@@ -1801,8 +1805,8 @@
Value *PBIV = PN->getIncomingValue(PBBIdx);
if (BIV != PBIV) {
// Insert a select in PBI to pick the right value.
- Value *NV = SelectInst::Create(PBICond, PBIV, BIV,
- PBIV->getName()+".mux", PBI);
+ Value *NV = cast<SelectInst>
+ (Builder.CreateSelect(PBICond, PBIV, BIV, PBIV->getName()+".mux"));
PN->setIncomingValue(PBBIdx, NV);
}
}
@@ -2665,7 +2669,7 @@
// eliminate it, do so now.
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BB->begin()))
if (PN->getNumIncomingValues() == 2)
- Changed |= FoldTwoEntryPHINode(PN, TD, Builder);
+ Changed |= FoldTwoEntryPHINode(PN, TD);
Builder.SetInsertPoint(BB->getTerminator());
if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator())) {
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list