[llvm-commits] [llvm] r127522 - /llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp
Jakob Stoklund Olesen
stoklund at 2pi.dk
Fri Mar 11 17:50:35 PST 2011
Author: stoklund
Date: Fri Mar 11 19:50:35 2011
New Revision: 127522
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=127522&view=rev
Log:
That's it, I am declaring this a failure of the C++03 STL.
There are too many compatibility problems with using mixed types in
std::upper_bound, and I don't want to spend 110 lines of boilerplate setting up
a call to a 10-line function. Binary search is not /that/ hard to implement
correctly.
I tried terminating the binary search with a linear search, but that actually
made the algorithm slower against my expectation. Most live intervals have less
than 4 segments. The early test against endIndex() does pay, and this version is
25% faster than plain std::upper_bound().
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp?rev=127522&r1=127521&r2=127522&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/LiveInterval.cpp Fri Mar 11 19:50:35 2011
@@ -30,126 +30,22 @@
#include <algorithm>
using namespace llvm;
-// SlotIndexIterator - adapt an iterator over LiveRanges to look
-// like an iterator over SlotIndexes by accessing the .end member.
-namespace {
-struct SlotIndexIterator
- : std::iterator<std::random_access_iterator_tag, SlotIndex> {
-
- SlotIndexIterator() {
- }
-
- explicit SlotIndexIterator(LiveInterval::iterator it)
- : it(it) {
- }
-
- SlotIndexIterator(const SlotIndexIterator & that)
- : it(that.it) {
- }
-
- SlotIndexIterator & operator=(const SlotIndexIterator & that) {
- it = that.it;
- return *this;
- }
-
- SlotIndexIterator & operator++() {
- ++it;
- return *this;
- }
-
- SlotIndexIterator operator++(int) {
- SlotIndexIterator that(*this);
- ++*this;
- return that;
- }
-
- SlotIndexIterator & operator--() {
- --it;
- return *this;
- }
-
- SlotIndexIterator operator--(int) {
- SlotIndexIterator that(*this);
- --*this;
- return that;
- }
-
- SlotIndexIterator & operator+=(std::ptrdiff_t n) {
- it += n;
- return *this;
- }
-
- SlotIndexIterator & operator-=(std::ptrdiff_t n) {
- it -= n;
- return *this;
- }
-
- friend bool operator==(SlotIndexIterator lhs, SlotIndexIterator rhs) {
- return lhs.it == rhs.it;
- }
-
- friend bool operator!=(SlotIndexIterator lhs, SlotIndexIterator rhs) {
- return lhs.it != rhs.it;
- }
-
- friend bool operator<(SlotIndexIterator lhs, SlotIndexIterator rhs) {
- return lhs.it < rhs.it;
- }
-
- friend bool operator<=(SlotIndexIterator lhs, SlotIndexIterator rhs) {
- return lhs.it <= rhs.it;
- }
-
- friend bool operator>(SlotIndexIterator lhs, SlotIndexIterator rhs) {
- return lhs.it > rhs.it;
- }
-
- friend bool operator>=(SlotIndexIterator lhs, SlotIndexIterator rhs) {
- return lhs.it >= rhs.it;
- }
-
- friend SlotIndexIterator operator+(SlotIndexIterator that, std::ptrdiff_t n) {
- return SlotIndexIterator(that.it + n);
- }
-
- friend SlotIndexIterator operator+(std::ptrdiff_t n, SlotIndexIterator that) {
- return SlotIndexIterator(n + that.it);
- }
-
- friend SlotIndexIterator operator-(SlotIndexIterator that, std::ptrdiff_t n) {
- return SlotIndexIterator(that.it - n);
- }
-
- friend std::ptrdiff_t operator-(SlotIndexIterator lhs, SlotIndexIterator rhs) {
- return lhs.it - rhs.it;
- }
-
- reference operator*() const {
- return it->end;
- }
-
- reference operator[](std::ptrdiff_t n) const {
- return it[n].end;
- }
-
- pointer operator->() const {
- return &it->end;
- }
-
- LiveInterval::iterator base() const {
- return it;
- }
-
-private:
- LiveInterval::iterator it;
-};
-}
-
LiveInterval::iterator LiveInterval::find(SlotIndex Pos) {
- assert(Pos.isValid() && "Cannot search for an invalid index");
- return std::upper_bound(
- SlotIndexIterator(begin()),
- SlotIndexIterator(end()), Pos).base();
+ // This algorithm is basically std::upper_bound.
+ // Unfortunately, std::upper_bound cannot be used with mixed types until we
+ // adopt C++0x. Many libraries can do it, but not all.
+ if (empty() || Pos >= endIndex())
+ return end();
+ iterator I = begin();
+ size_t Len = ranges.size();
+ do {
+ size_t Mid = Len >> 1;
+ if (Pos < I[Mid].end)
+ Len = Mid;
+ else
+ I += Mid + 1, Len -= Mid + 1;
+ } while (Len);
+ return I;
}
/// killedInRange - Return true if the interval has kills in [Start,End).
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list