[llvm-commits] patch: improve instsimplify with non-recursive ranges

[Frits van Bommel]

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Frits van Bommel <fvbommel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:04 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote:
>> It seems a little weird to me that we weren't already catching some of these
>> cases, and also that there isn't a utility method somewhere that produces a
>> ConstantRange given an instruction for me. Should I land this patch as-is,
>> then try to find pieces of instcombine (and others?) that are now redundant?
>
> It'd already be make the code right above it redundant if you'd use a

s/be make/make/