[llvm-commits] [llvm] r122114 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/Support/ValueHandle.h include/llvm/Value.h lib/VMCore/Value.cpp
Owen Anderson
resistor at mac.com
Fri Dec 17 16:07:15 PST 2010
Author: resistor
Date: Fri Dec 17 18:07:15 2010
New Revision: 122114
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=122114&view=rev
Log:
Add support to CallbackVH to receive notification when a Value's use-list changes.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Support/ValueHandle.h
llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Value.h
llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Support/ValueHandle.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Support/ValueHandle.h?rev=122114&r1=122113&r2=122114&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Support/ValueHandle.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Support/ValueHandle.h Fri Dec 17 18:07:15 2010
@@ -105,6 +105,7 @@
// Callbacks made from Value.
static void ValueIsDeleted(Value *V);
static void ValueIsRAUWd(Value *Old, Value *New);
+ static void ValueAddedUse(Use &U);
// Internal implementation details.
ValueHandleBase **getPrevPtr() const { return PrevPair.getPointer(); }
@@ -389,6 +390,11 @@
/// implemented as a CallbackVH, it would use this method to call
/// setValPtr(new_value). AssertingVH would do nothing in this method.
virtual void allUsesReplacedWith(Value *) {}
+
+ /// Called when a new Use is added to the use-list of this->getValPtr(),
+ /// after the Use has been appended to the list. Other VH kinds would ignore
+ /// this callback, but clients can use it to trigger re-analysis of Values.
+ virtual void addedUse(Use &U) {}
};
// Specialize simplify_type to allow CallbackVH to participate in
Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Value.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Value.h?rev=122114&r1=122113&r2=122114&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Value.h (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Value.h Fri Dec 17 18:07:15 2010
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
/// addUse - This method should only be used by the Use class.
///
- void addUse(Use &U) { U.addToList(&UseList); }
+ void addUse(Use &U);
/// An enumeration for keeping track of the concrete subclass of Value that
/// is actually instantiated. Values of this enumeration are kept in the
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp?rev=122114&r1=122113&r2=122114&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/Value.cpp Fri Dec 17 18:07:15 2010
@@ -281,6 +281,16 @@
}
+/// addUse - This method should only be used by the Use class.
+///
+void Value::addUse(Use &U) {
+ U.addToList(&UseList);
+
+ // Notify all ValueHandles (if present) that this value added a Use.
+ if (HasValueHandle)
+ ValueHandleBase::ValueAddedUse(U);
+}
+
// uncheckedReplaceAllUsesWith - This is exactly the same as replaceAllUsesWith,
// except that it doesn't have all of the asserts. The asserts fail because we
// are half-way done resolving types, which causes some types to exist as two
@@ -569,6 +579,34 @@
}
}
+void ValueHandleBase::ValueAddedUse(Use &U) {
+ assert(U->HasValueHandle && "Should only be called if ValueHandles present");
+
+ // Get the linked list base, which is guaranteed to exist since the
+ // HasValueHandle flag is set.
+ LLVMContextImpl *pImpl = U->getContext().pImpl;
+ ValueHandleBase *Entry = pImpl->ValueHandles[U.get()];
+
+ assert(Entry && "Value bit set but no entries exist");
+
+ // We use a local ValueHandleBase as an iterator so that
+ // ValueHandles can add and remove themselves from the list without
+ // breaking our iteration. This is not really an AssertingVH; we
+ // just have to give ValueHandleBase some kind.
+ for (ValueHandleBase Iterator(Assert, *Entry); Entry; Entry = Iterator.Next) {
+ Iterator.RemoveFromUseList();
+ Iterator.AddToExistingUseListAfter(Entry);
+ assert(Entry->Next == &Iterator && "Loop invariant broken.");
+
+ switch (Entry->getKind()) {
+ default:
+ break;
+ case Callback:
+ static_cast<CallbackVH*>(Entry)->addedUse(U);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+}
void ValueHandleBase::ValueIsRAUWd(Value *Old, Value *New) {
assert(Old->HasValueHandle &&"Should only be called if ValueHandles present");
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list