[llvm-commits] [LLVMdev] PR 8199 - Can we get patches reviewed?

[David A. Greene]

Jason Kim <jasonwkim at google.com> writes:

> I'd vote getting rid of the llvm-gcc bindir being prepended as the
> easiest solution to fix this.

That won't fix the underlying problem.  What if the tester just happens
to have an llc, opt, etc. in her PATH?  We need to give absolute paths
to the tools we're testing, otherwise we don't know what we're testing.

> If the list of executables changes, then the explicit list of known
> tools need to change as well.
> Problem is, I can't immediately think of a nice way to get the list of
> generated execs exported to llvm-lit,

Do we create new tools all that often?

                                -Dave