[llvm-commits] [llvm] r113176 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp utils/TableGen/AsmMatcherEmitter.cpp
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Mon Sep 6 14:54:15 PDT 2010
Author: lattner
Date: Mon Sep 6 16:54:15 2010
New Revision: 113176
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=113176&view=rev
Log:
Now that we know if we had a total fail on the instruction mnemonic,
give a more detailed error. Before:
t.s:11:4: error: unrecognized instruction
addl $1, $1
^
t.s:12:4: error: unrecognized instruction
f2efqefa $1
^
After:
t.s:11:4: error: invalid operand for instruction
addl $1, $1
^
t.s:12:4: error: invalid instruction mnemonic 'f2efqefa'
f2efqefa $1
^
This fixes rdar://8017912 - llvm-mc says "unrecognized instruction" when it means "invalid operands"
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen/AsmMatcherEmitter.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp?rev=113176&r1=113175&r2=113176&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp Mon Sep 6 16:54:15 2010
@@ -862,6 +862,8 @@
MCInst &Inst) {
assert(!Operands.empty() && "Unexpect empty operand list!");
+ bool WasOriginallyInvalidOperand = false;
+
// First, try a direct match.
switch (MatchInstructionImpl(Operands, Inst)) {
case Match_Success:
@@ -869,7 +871,10 @@
case Match_MissingFeature:
Error(IDLoc, "instruction requires a CPU feature not currently enabled");
return true;
- default:
+ case Match_InvalidOperand:
+ WasOriginallyInvalidOperand = true;
+ break;
+ case Match_MnemonicFail:
break;
}
@@ -941,23 +946,38 @@
return true;
}
- unsigned NumMatchFailures =
- (MatchB == Match_Fail) + (MatchW == Match_Fail) +
- (MatchL == Match_Fail) + (MatchQ == Match_Fail);
+ // Okay, we know that none of the variants matched successfully.
+ // If all of the instructions reported an invalid mnemonic, then the original
+ // mnemonic was invalid.
+ if ((MatchB == Match_MnemonicFail) && (MatchW == Match_MnemonicFail) &&
+ (MatchL == Match_MnemonicFail) && (MatchQ == Match_MnemonicFail)) {
+ if (WasOriginallyInvalidOperand)
+ Error(IDLoc, "invalid operand for instruction");
+ else
+ Error(IDLoc, "invalid instruction mnemonic '" + Base + "'");
+ return true;
+ }
// If one instruction matched with a missing feature, report this as a
// missing feature.
if ((MatchB == Match_MissingFeature) + (MatchW == Match_MissingFeature) +
- (MatchL == Match_MissingFeature) + (MatchQ == Match_MissingFeature) == 1&&
- NumMatchFailures == 3) {
+ (MatchL == Match_MissingFeature) + (MatchQ == Match_MissingFeature) == 1){
Error(IDLoc, "instruction requires a CPU feature not currently enabled");
return true;
}
+ // If one instruction matched with an invalid operand, report this as an
+ // operand failure.
+ if ((MatchB == Match_InvalidOperand) + (MatchW == Match_InvalidOperand) +
+ (MatchL == Match_InvalidOperand) + (MatchQ == Match_InvalidOperand) == 1){
+ Error(IDLoc, "invalid operand for instruction");
+ return true;
+ }
+
// If all of these were an outright failure, report it in a useless way.
// FIXME: We should give nicer diagnostics about the exact failure.
- Error(IDLoc, "unrecognized instruction");
+ Error(IDLoc, "unknown use of instruction mnemonic without a size suffix");
return true;
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen/AsmMatcherEmitter.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen/AsmMatcherEmitter.cpp?rev=113176&r1=113175&r2=113176&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen/AsmMatcherEmitter.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen/AsmMatcherEmitter.cpp Mon Sep 6 16:54:15 2010
@@ -1559,7 +1559,8 @@
OS << " unsigned ComputeAvailableFeatures(const " <<
Target.getName() << "Subtarget *Subtarget) const;\n";
OS << " enum MatchResultTy {\n";
- OS << " Match_Success, Match_Fail, Match_MissingFeature\n";
+ OS << " Match_Success, Match_MnemonicFail, Match_InvalidOperand,\n";
+ OS << " Match_MissingFeature\n";
OS << " };\n";
OS << " MatchResultTy MatchInstructionImpl(const SmallVectorImpl<MCParsedAsmOperand*>"
<< " &Operands, MCInst &Inst);\n\n";
@@ -1687,7 +1688,7 @@
// Emit code to compute the class list for this operand vector.
OS << " // Eliminate obvious mismatches.\n";
OS << " if (Operands.size() > " << MaxNumOperands << "+1)\n";
- OS << " return Match_Fail;\n\n";
+ OS << " return Match_InvalidOperand;\n\n";
OS << " // Compute the class list for this operand vector.\n";
OS << " MatchClassKind Classes[" << MaxNumOperands << "];\n";
@@ -1696,7 +1697,7 @@
OS << " // Check for invalid operands before matching.\n";
OS << " if (Classes[i-1] == InvalidMatchClass)\n";
- OS << " return Match_Fail;\n";
+ OS << " return Match_InvalidOperand;\n";
OS << " }\n\n";
OS << " // Mark unused classes.\n";
@@ -1716,6 +1717,10 @@
OS << " std::equal_range(MatchTable, MatchTable+"
<< Info.Instructions.size() << ", Mnemonic, LessOpcode());\n\n";
+ OS << " // Return a more specific error code if no mnemonics match.\n";
+ OS << " if (MnemonicRange.first == MnemonicRange.second)\n";
+ OS << " return Match_MnemonicFail;\n\n";
+
OS << " for (const MatchEntry *it = MnemonicRange.first, "
<< "*ie = MnemonicRange.second;\n";
OS << " it != ie; ++it) {\n";
@@ -1751,7 +1756,7 @@
OS << " // Okay, we had no match. Try to return a useful error code.\n";
OS << " if (HadMatchOtherThanFeatures) return Match_MissingFeature;\n";
- OS << " return Match_Fail;\n";
+ OS << " return Match_InvalidOperand;\n";
OS << "}\n\n";
OS << "#endif // GET_MATCHER_IMPLEMENTATION\n\n";
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list