[llvm-commits] [llvm] r112669 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp test/Transforms/LICM/hoisting.ll test/Transforms/LICM/scalar_promote.ll
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Tue Aug 31 16:00:16 PDT 2010
Author: lattner
Date: Tue Aug 31 18:00:16 2010
New Revision: 112669
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=112669&view=rev
Log:
licm is wasting time hoisting constant foldable operations,
instead of hoisting them, just fold them away. This occurs in the
testcase for PR8041, for example.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/hoisting.ll
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/scalar_promote.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp?rev=112669&r1=112668&r2=112669&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LICM.cpp Tue Aug 31 18:00:16 2010
@@ -36,11 +36,11 @@
#include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h"
#include "llvm/IntrinsicInst.h"
#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
-#include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
@@ -353,6 +353,18 @@
for (BasicBlock::iterator II = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); II != E; ) {
Instruction &I = *II++;
+ // Try constant folding this instruction. If all the operands are
+ // constants, it is technically hoistable, but it would be better to just
+ // fold it.
+ if (Constant *C = ConstantFoldInstruction(&I)) {
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "LICM folding inst: " << I << " --> " << *C << '\n');
+ CurAST->copyValue(&I, C);
+ CurAST->deleteValue(&I);
+ I.replaceAllUsesWith(C);
+ I.eraseFromParent();
+ continue;
+ }
+
// Try hoisting the instruction out to the preheader. We can only do this
// if all of the operands of the instruction are loop invariant and if it
// is safe to hoist the instruction.
@@ -360,7 +372,7 @@
if (isLoopInvariantInst(I) && canSinkOrHoistInst(I) &&
isSafeToExecuteUnconditionally(I))
hoist(I);
- }
+ }
const std::vector<DomTreeNode*> &Children = N->getChildren();
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Children.size(); i != e; ++i)
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/hoisting.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/hoisting.ll?rev=112669&r1=112668&r2=112669&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/hoisting.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/hoisting.ll Tue Aug 31 18:00:16 2010
@@ -48,3 +48,19 @@
%C = sub i32 %A, %B ; <i32> [#uses=1]
ret i32 %C
}
+
+
+; This loop invariant instruction should be constant folded, not hoisted.
+define i32 @test3(i1 %c) {
+; CHECK: define i32 @test3
+; CHECK: call void @foo2(i32 6)
+ %A = load i32* @X ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ br label %Loop
+Loop:
+ %B = add i32 4, 2 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
+ call void @foo2( i32 %B )
+ br i1 %c, label %Loop, label %Out
+Out: ; preds = %Loop
+ %C = sub i32 %A, %B ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ ret i32 %C
+}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/scalar_promote.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/scalar_promote.ll?rev=112669&r1=112668&r2=112669&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/scalar_promote.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LICM/scalar_promote.ll Tue Aug 31 18:00:16 2010
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
; RUN: opt < %s -licm -S | FileCheck %s
+target datalayout = "E-p:64:64:64-a0:0:8-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128"
+
@X = global i32 7 ; <i32*> [#uses=4]
define void @test1(i32 %i) {
@@ -32,23 +34,21 @@
br label %Loop
; CHECK: @test2
; CHECK: Entry:
-; CHECK-NEXT: %X1 = getelementptr i32* @X, i64 0
-; CHECK-NEXT: %X2 = getelementptr i32* @X, i64 0
-; CHECK-NEXT: %X1.promoted = load i32* %X1
+; CHECK-NEXT: %.promoted = load i32* getelementptr inbounds (i32* @X, i64 1)
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %Loop
Loop: ; preds = %Loop, %0
- %X1 = getelementptr i32* @X, i64 0 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
+ %X1 = getelementptr i32* @X, i64 1 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
%A = load i32* %X1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%V = add i32 %A, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
- %X2 = getelementptr i32* @X, i64 0 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
+ %X2 = getelementptr i32* @X, i64 1 ; <i32*> [#uses=1]
store i32 %V, i32* %X2
br i1 false, label %Loop, label %Exit
Exit: ; preds = %Loop
ret void
; CHECK: Exit:
-; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 %V, i32* %X1
+; CHECK-NEXT: store i32 %V, i32* getelementptr inbounds (i32* @X, i64 1)
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list