[llvm-commits] [llvm] r111665 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineLoadStoreAlloca.cpp test/Transforms/InstCombine/2010-08-19-StoreNarrowing.ll
Owen Anderson
resistor at mac.com
Mon Aug 30 16:47:09 PDT 2010
On Aug 30, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>
>> + ConstantInt *CI1 =0, *CI2 = 0;
>> + Value *Ld = 0;
>> + if (getTargetData() &&
>> + match(SI.getValueOperand(),
>> + m_And(m_Or(m_Value(Ld), m_ConstantInt(CI1)), m_ConstantInt(CI2))) &&
>> + isa<LoadInst>(Ld) &&
>> + equivalentAddressValues(cast<LoadInst>(Ld)->getPointerOperand(), Ptr)) {
>
> I don't see where you check to make sure you don't have something like:
>
> x = load P
> store 123 -> Q ;; might alias P!
> x' = stuff(x)
> store x' -> P
>
> How do you know the loaded value hasn't been changed in memory? Also, you don't check for a volatile load here.
Good catch. Is this even reasonably fixable within the context of instcombine? It looks like we'd want to use something like memdep to guarantee that there are no intervening writes to P.
--Owen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20100830/f9118c6d/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list