[llvm-commits] [patch] Don't link as many parts of llvm into bugpoint

[Sandeep Patel]

If this and the previous patches related to plugins break bugpoint on
MinGW, please revert them. I'd like for my users to be able to reduce
bugs for me.

deep

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com> wrote:
> The attached patch is mostly a request for comments. On a debug build
> it reduces bugpoint from 68 MB to 34 MB. The difference is not free:
>
> *) The std-compile-opts and std-link-opts are gone.
> *) Passes now have to be listed with the -pass option.
>
> I think I can get those back with some more refactoring, but would
> like some opinions first. Do you think the patch is OK? Do you think
> it is OK if I manage to keep the current command line interface? The
> main reason for this is that since bugpoint is a tool for hunting bugs
> in llvm, it is nice for it to not be linked with every single LLVM
> pass. Specially if the only thing it does with most of those passes is
> collect their names :-)
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>