[llvm-commits] [llvm] r97791 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp test/CodeGen/X86/crash.ll
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Thu Mar 4 22:19:13 PST 2010
Author: lattner
Date: Fri Mar 5 00:19:13 2010
New Revision: 97791
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=97791&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR6497, a bug where we'd fold a load into an addc
node which has a flag. That flag in turn was used by an
already-selected adde which turned into an ADC32ri8 which
used a selected load which was chained to the load we
folded. This flag use caused us to form a cycle. Fix
this by not ignoring chains in IsLegalToFold even in
cases where the isel thinks it can.
Added:
llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/crash.ll
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp?rev=97791&r1=97790&r2=97791&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp Fri Mar 5 00:19:13 2010
@@ -1485,7 +1485,14 @@
break;
Root = FU;
VT = Root->getValueType(Root->getNumValues()-1);
+
+ // If our query node has a flag result with a use, we've walked up it. If
+ // the user (which has already been selected) has a chain or indirectly uses
+ // the chain, our WalkChainUsers predicate will not consider it. Because of
+ // this, we cannot ignore chains in this predicate.
+ IgnoreChains = false;
}
+
SmallPtrSet<SDNode*, 16> Visited;
return !findNonImmUse(Root, N.getNode(), U, Root, Visited, IgnoreChains);
Added: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/crash.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/crash.ll?rev=97791&view=auto
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/crash.ll (added)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/crash.ll Fri Mar 5 00:19:13 2010
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+; RUN: llc -march=x86 %s -o -
+; RUN: llc -march=x86-64 %s -o -
+
+; PR6497
+
+; Chain and flag folding issues.
+define i32 @test1() nounwind ssp {
+entry:
+ %tmp5.i = volatile load i32* undef ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %conv.i = zext i32 %tmp5.i to i64 ; <i64> [#uses=1]
+ %tmp12.i = volatile load i32* undef ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ %conv13.i = zext i32 %tmp12.i to i64 ; <i64> [#uses=1]
+ %shl.i = shl i64 %conv13.i, 32 ; <i64> [#uses=1]
+ %or.i = or i64 %shl.i, %conv.i ; <i64> [#uses=1]
+ %add16.i = add i64 %or.i, 256 ; <i64> [#uses=1]
+ %shr.i = lshr i64 %add16.i, 8 ; <i64> [#uses=1]
+ %conv19.i = trunc i64 %shr.i to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
+ volatile store i32 %conv19.i, i32* undef
+ ret i32 undef
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list