[llvm-commits] [llvm] r95229 - /llvm/trunk/docs/index.html

Wed Feb 3 10:34:10 PST 2010

On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:

> Author: jyasskin
> Date: Wed Feb  3 12:23:23 2010
> New Revision: 95229
> 
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=95229&view=rev
> Log:
> Mention the version in the documentation index and link to the 2.6 docs, which
> is what most readers will actually be aiming for.

Instead of mentioning 2.6 and 2.7, how about just linking to releases/ instead of 2.6 and mention "SVN head" instead of 2.7.

-Chris

> 
> Modified:
>    llvm/trunk/docs/index.html
> 
> Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/index.html
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/index.html?rev=95229&r1=95228&r2=95229&view=diff
> 
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/docs/index.html (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/docs/index.html Wed Feb  3 12:23:23 2010
> @@ -2,12 +2,15 @@
>                       "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
> <html>
> <head>
> -  <title>Documentation for the LLVM System</title>
> +  <title>Documentation for the LLVM System, version pre-2.7</title>
>   <link rel="stylesheet" href="llvm.css" type="text/css">
> </head>
> <body>
> 
> -<div class="doc_title">Documentation for the LLVM System</div>
> +<div class="doc_title">Documentation for the LLVM System, version pre-2.7</div>
> +
> +<p class="doc_warning">If you are using the most recent release of LLVM,
> +see <a href="http://llvm.org/releases/2.6/docs/">the llvm-2.6 documentation</a>.</p>
> 
> <div class="doc_text">
> <table class="layout" width="95%"><tr class="layout"><td class="left">
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits