[llvm-commits] [llvm] r95007 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp

Bob Wilson bob.wilson at apple.com
Mon Feb 1 13:17:14 PST 2010


Author: bwilson
Date: Mon Feb  1 15:17:14 2010
New Revision: 95007

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=95007&view=rev
Log:
Add an option to GVN to remove all partially redundant loads.  This is currently
disabled by default.  This divides the existing load PRE code into 2 phases:
first it checks that it is safe to move the load to each of the predecessors
where it is unavailable, and then if it is safe, the code is changed to move
the load.  Radar 7571861.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp?rev=95007&r1=95006&r2=95007&view=diff

==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp Mon Feb  1 15:17:14 2010
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
 static cl::opt<bool> EnablePRE("enable-pre",
                                cl::init(true), cl::Hidden);
 static cl::opt<bool> EnableLoadPRE("enable-load-pre", cl::init(true));
+static cl::opt<bool> EnableFullLoadPRE("enable-full-load-pre", cl::init(false));
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 //                         ValueTable Class
@@ -1537,10 +1538,12 @@
   // at least one of the values is LI.  Since this means that we won't be able
   // to eliminate LI even if we insert uses in the other predecessors, we will
   // end up increasing code size.  Reject this by scanning for LI.
-  for (unsigned i = 0, e = ValuesPerBlock.size(); i != e; ++i)
-    if (ValuesPerBlock[i].isSimpleValue() &&
-        ValuesPerBlock[i].getSimpleValue() == LI)
-      return false;
+  if (!EnableFullLoadPRE) {
+    for (unsigned i = 0, e = ValuesPerBlock.size(); i != e; ++i)
+      if (ValuesPerBlock[i].isSimpleValue() &&
+          ValuesPerBlock[i].getSimpleValue() == LI)
+        return false;
+  }
 
   // FIXME: It is extremely unclear what this loop is doing, other than
   // artificially restricting loadpre.
@@ -1564,13 +1567,9 @@
       return false;
   }
 
-  // Okay, we have some hope :).  Check to see if the loaded value is fully
-  // available in all but one predecessor.
-  // FIXME: If we could restructure the CFG, we could make a common pred with
-  // all the preds that don't have an available LI and insert a new load into
-  // that one block.
-  BasicBlock *UnavailablePred = 0;
-
+  // Check to see how many predecessors have the loaded value fully
+  // available.
+  DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*> PredLoads;
   DenseMap<BasicBlock*, char> FullyAvailableBlocks;
   for (unsigned i = 0, e = ValuesPerBlock.size(); i != e; ++i)
     FullyAvailableBlocks[ValuesPerBlock[i].BB] = true;
@@ -1579,81 +1578,93 @@
 
   for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(LoadBB), E = pred_end(LoadBB);
        PI != E; ++PI) {
-    if (IsValueFullyAvailableInBlock(*PI, FullyAvailableBlocks))
+    BasicBlock *Pred = *PI;
+    if (IsValueFullyAvailableInBlock(Pred, FullyAvailableBlocks)) {
       continue;
-
-    // If this load is not available in multiple predecessors, reject it.
-    if (UnavailablePred && UnavailablePred != *PI)
+    }
+    PredLoads[Pred] = 0;
+    // We don't currently handle critical edges :(
+    if (Pred->getTerminator()->getNumSuccessors() != 1) {
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "COULD NOT PRE LOAD BECAUSE OF CRITICAL EDGE '"
+            << Pred->getName() << "': " << *LI << '\n');
       return false;
-    UnavailablePred = *PI;
+    }
   }
 
-  assert(UnavailablePred != 0 &&
+  // Decide whether PRE is profitable for this load.
+  unsigned NumUnavailablePreds = PredLoads.size();
+  assert(NumUnavailablePreds != 0 &&
          "Fully available value should be eliminated above!");
-
-  // We don't currently handle critical edges :(
-  if (UnavailablePred->getTerminator()->getNumSuccessors() != 1) {
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "COULD NOT PRE LOAD BECAUSE OF CRITICAL EDGE '"
-                 << UnavailablePred->getName() << "': " << *LI << '\n');
-    return false;
+  if (!EnableFullLoadPRE) {
+    // If this load is unavailable in multiple predecessors, reject it.
+    // FIXME: If we could restructure the CFG, we could make a common pred with
+    // all the preds that don't have an available LI and insert a new load into
+    // that one block.
+    if (NumUnavailablePreds != 1)
+      return false;
   }
-  
-  // Do PHI translation to get its value in the predecessor if necessary.  The
-  // returned pointer (if non-null) is guaranteed to dominate UnavailablePred.
-  //
+
+  // Check if the load can safely be moved to all the unavailable predecessors.
+  bool CanDoPRE = true;
   SmallVector<Instruction*, 8> NewInsts;
-  
-  // If all preds have a single successor, then we know it is safe to insert the
-  // load on the pred (?!?), so we can insert code to materialize the pointer if
-  // it is not available.
-  PHITransAddr Address(LI->getOperand(0), TD);
-  Value *LoadPtr = 0;
-  if (allSingleSucc) {
-    LoadPtr = Address.PHITranslateWithInsertion(LoadBB, UnavailablePred,
-                                                *DT, NewInsts);
-  } else {
-    Address.PHITranslateValue(LoadBB, UnavailablePred);
-    LoadPtr = Address.getAddr();
+  for (DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*>::iterator I = PredLoads.begin(),
+         E = PredLoads.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+    BasicBlock *UnavailablePred = I->first;
+
+    // Do PHI translation to get its value in the predecessor if necessary.  The
+    // returned pointer (if non-null) is guaranteed to dominate UnavailablePred.
+
+    // If all preds have a single successor, then we know it is safe to insert
+    // the load on the pred (?!?), so we can insert code to materialize the
+    // pointer if it is not available.
+    PHITransAddr Address(LI->getOperand(0), TD);
+    Value *LoadPtr = 0;
+    if (allSingleSucc) {
+      LoadPtr = Address.PHITranslateWithInsertion(LoadBB, UnavailablePred,
+                                                  *DT, NewInsts);
+    } else {
+      Address.PHITranslateValue(LoadBB, UnavailablePred);
+      LoadPtr = Address.getAddr();
     
-    // Make sure the value is live in the predecessor.
-    if (Instruction *Inst = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(LoadPtr))
-      if (!DT->dominates(Inst->getParent(), UnavailablePred))
-        LoadPtr = 0;
-  }
+      // Make sure the value is live in the predecessor.
+      if (Instruction *Inst = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(LoadPtr))
+        if (!DT->dominates(Inst->getParent(), UnavailablePred))
+          LoadPtr = 0;
+    }
 
-  // If we couldn't find or insert a computation of this phi translated value,
-  // we fail PRE.
-  if (LoadPtr == 0) {
-    assert(NewInsts.empty() && "Shouldn't insert insts on failure");
-    DEBUG(dbgs() << "COULDN'T INSERT PHI TRANSLATED VALUE OF: "
-                 << *LI->getOperand(0) << "\n");
-    return false;
-  }
+    // If we couldn't find or insert a computation of this phi translated value,
+    // we fail PRE.
+    if (LoadPtr == 0) {
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << "COULDN'T INSERT PHI TRANSLATED VALUE OF: "
+            << *LI->getOperand(0) << "\n");
+      CanDoPRE = false;
+      break;
+    }
 
-  // Assign value numbers to these new instructions.
-  for (unsigned i = 0, e = NewInsts.size(); i != e; ++i) {
-    // FIXME: We really _ought_ to insert these value numbers into their 
-    // parent's availability map.  However, in doing so, we risk getting into
-    // ordering issues.  If a block hasn't been processed yet, we would be
-    // marking a value as AVAIL-IN, which isn't what we intend.
-    VN.lookup_or_add(NewInsts[i]);
+    // Make sure it is valid to move this load here.  We have to watch out for:
+    //  @1 = getelementptr (i8* p, ...
+    //  test p and branch if == 0
+    //  load @1
+    // It is valid to have the getelementptr before the test, even if p can be 0,
+    // as getelementptr only does address arithmetic.
+    // If we are not pushing the value through any multiple-successor blocks
+    // we do not have this case.  Otherwise, check that the load is safe to
+    // put anywhere; this can be improved, but should be conservatively safe.
+    if (!allSingleSucc &&
+        // FIXME: REEVALUTE THIS.
+        !isSafeToLoadUnconditionally(LoadPtr,
+                                     UnavailablePred->getTerminator(),
+                                     LI->getAlignment(), TD)) {
+      CanDoPRE = false;
+      break;
+    }
+
+    I->second = LoadPtr;
   }
-  
-  // Make sure it is valid to move this load here.  We have to watch out for:
-  //  @1 = getelementptr (i8* p, ...
-  //  test p and branch if == 0
-  //  load @1
-  // It is valid to have the getelementptr before the test, even if p can be 0,
-  // as getelementptr only does address arithmetic.
-  // If we are not pushing the value through any multiple-successor blocks
-  // we do not have this case.  Otherwise, check that the load is safe to
-  // put anywhere; this can be improved, but should be conservatively safe.
-  if (!allSingleSucc &&
-      // FIXME: REEVALUTE THIS.
-      !isSafeToLoadUnconditionally(LoadPtr,
-                                   UnavailablePred->getTerminator(),
-                                   LI->getAlignment(), TD)) {
-    assert(NewInsts.empty() && "Should not have inserted instructions");
+
+  if (!CanDoPRE) {
+    while (!NewInsts.empty())
+      NewInsts.pop_back_val()->eraseFromParent();
     return false;
   }
 
@@ -1665,12 +1676,28 @@
           dbgs() << "INSERTED " << NewInsts.size() << " INSTS: "
                  << *NewInsts.back() << '\n');
   
-  Value *NewLoad = new LoadInst(LoadPtr, LI->getName()+".pre", false,
-                                LI->getAlignment(),
-                                UnavailablePred->getTerminator());
+  // Assign value numbers to the new instructions.
+  for (unsigned i = 0, e = NewInsts.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+    // FIXME: We really _ought_ to insert these value numbers into their 
+    // parent's availability map.  However, in doing so, we risk getting into
+    // ordering issues.  If a block hasn't been processed yet, we would be
+    // marking a value as AVAIL-IN, which isn't what we intend.
+    VN.lookup_or_add(NewInsts[i]);
+  }
 
-  // Add the newly created load.
-  ValuesPerBlock.push_back(AvailableValueInBlock::get(UnavailablePred,NewLoad));
+  for (DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*>::iterator I = PredLoads.begin(),
+         E = PredLoads.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+    BasicBlock *UnavailablePred = I->first;
+    Value *LoadPtr = I->second;
+
+    Value *NewLoad = new LoadInst(LoadPtr, LI->getName()+".pre", false,
+                                  LI->getAlignment(),
+                                  UnavailablePred->getTerminator());
+
+    // Add the newly created load.
+    ValuesPerBlock.push_back(AvailableValueInBlock::get(UnavailablePred,
+                                                        NewLoad));
+  }
 
   // Perform PHI construction.
   Value *V = ConstructSSAForLoadSet(LI, ValuesPerBlock, TD, *DT,





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list