[llvm-commits] [llvm] r92939 - /llvm/trunk/include/llvm/IntrinsicsX86.td
Chris Lattner
clattner at apple.com
Thu Jan 7 13:18:43 PST 2010
On Jan 7, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 12:22 PM, David Greene wrote:
>
>> What llvm intrinsics?
>>
>> We don't "need" them in the sense of functionality, but gcc defines
>> them
>> so it makes sense to support them.
>>
>> Adding them also makes the SIMD reorganization a bit simpler.
>
> I don't think you're understanding what Evan was saying. We don't
> need, at least, the "gcc intrinsic" part of it because the gcc
> intrinsic should be lowered to explicit llvm instructions instead of
> llvm intrinsics.
>
> The gcc intrinsics should be supported, but if possible they should
> be lowered to instructions instead of intrinsics.
right. David, please revert this patch.
-Chris
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list