[llvm-commits] [llvm] r91701 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
Dan Gohman
gohman at apple.com
Fri Dec 18 10:45:31 PST 2009
Author: djg
Date: Fri Dec 18 12:45:31 2009
New Revision: 91701
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=91701&view=rev
Log:
Revert this use of NUW/NSW also. Overflow-undefined multiplication isn't
associative either.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp?rev=91701&r1=91700&r2=91701&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp Fri Dec 18 12:45:31 2009
@@ -1460,7 +1460,10 @@
AddRec->op_end());
AddRecOps[0] = getAddExpr(LIOps);
+ // It's tempting to propogate NUW/NSW flags here, but nuw/nsw addition
+ // is not associative so this isn't necessarily safe.
const SCEV *NewRec = getAddRecExpr(AddRecOps, AddRec->getLoop());
+
// If all of the other operands were loop invariant, we are done.
if (Ops.size() == 1) return NewRec;
@@ -1636,9 +1639,9 @@
}
}
- const SCEV *NewRec = getAddRecExpr(NewOps, AddRec->getLoop(),
- AddRec->hasNoUnsignedWrap() && HasNUW,
- AddRec->hasNoSignedWrap() && HasNSW);
+ // It's tempting to propogate NUW/NSW flags here, but nuw/nsw multiplication
+ // is not associative so this isn't necessarily safe.
+ const SCEV *NewRec = getAddRecExpr(NewOps, AddRec->getLoop());
// If all of the other operands were loop invariant, we are done.
if (Ops.size() == 1) return NewRec;
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list