[llvm-commits] [llvm] r83733 - /llvm/trunk/docs/CodeGenerator.html

[Chris Lattner]

Author: lattner
Date: Sat Oct 10 16:30:55 2009
New Revision: 83733

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=83733&view=rev
Log:
x86 uses 5 operands for most memory refs now.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/docs/CodeGenerator.html

Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/CodeGenerator.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/CodeGenerator.html?rev=83733&r1=83732&r2=83733&view=diff

==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/docs/CodeGenerator.html (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/docs/CodeGenerator.html Sat Oct 10 16:30:55 2009
@@ -1812,24 +1812,27 @@
 
 <div class="doc_code">
 <pre>
-Base + [1,2,4,8] * IndexReg + Disp32
+SegmentReg: Base + [1,2,4,8] * IndexReg + Disp32
 </pre>
 </div>
 
-<p>In order to represent this, LLVM tracks no less than 4 operands for each
+<p>In order to represent this, LLVM tracks no less than 5 operands for each
    memory operand of this form.  This means that the "load" form of
    '<tt>mov</tt>' has the following <tt>MachineOperand</tt>s in this order:</p>
 
 <div class="doc_code">
 <pre>
-Index:        0     |    1        2       3           4
-Meaning:   DestReg, | BaseReg,  Scale, IndexReg, Displacement
-OperandTy: VirtReg, | VirtReg, UnsImm, VirtReg,   SignExtImm
+Index:        0     |    1        2       3           4          5
+Meaning:   DestReg, | BaseReg,  Scale, IndexReg, Displacement Segment
+OperandTy: VirtReg, | VirtReg, UnsImm, VirtReg,   SignExtImm  PhysReg
 </pre>
 </div>
 
 <p>Stores, and all other instructions, treat the four memory operands in the
-   same way and in the same order.</p>
+   same way and in the same order.  If the segment register is unspecified
+   (regno = 0), then no segment override is generated.  "Lea" operations do not
+   have a segment register specified, so they only have 4 operands for their
+   memory reference.</p>
 
 </div>