[llvm-commits] [llvm] r81219 - /llvm/trunk/docs/LangRef.html

[Török Edwin]

On 2009-09-08 18:13, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Author: lattner
> Date: Tue Sep  8 10:13:16 2009
> New Revision: 81219
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=81219&view=rev
> Log:
> fix a couple typos pointed out by edwin and duncan
>
> Modified:
>     llvm/trunk/docs/LangRef.html
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/LangRef.html
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/LangRef.html?rev=81219&r1=81218&r2=81219&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/docs/LangRef.html (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/docs/LangRef.html Tue Sep  8 10:13:16 2009
> @@ -2116,7 +2116,7 @@
>  "variable" doesn't actually <em>have a live range</em>.  Instead, the value is
>  logically read from arbitrary registers that happen to be around when needed,
>  so the value is not neccesarily consistent over time.  In fact, %A and %C need
> -to have the same semantics of the core LLVM "replace all uses with" concept
> +to have the same semantics or the core LLVM "replace all uses with" concept
>  would not hold.</p>
>  
>  <div class="doc_code">
> @@ -2136,7 +2136,7 @@
>  not (currently) defined on SNaN's.  However, in the second example, we can make
>  a more aggressive assumption: because the undef is allowed to be an arbitrary
>  value, we are allowed to assume that it could be zero.  Since a divide by zero
> -is has <em>undefined behavior</em>, we are allowed to assume that the operation
> +it has <em>undefined behavior</em>, we are allowed to assume that the operation
>   

Since a divide by zero it has -> Since a divide by zero has

Best regards,
--Edwin