[llvm-commits] [llvm] r76236 - /llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp
Dan Gohman
gohman at apple.com
Fri Jul 17 13:59:11 PDT 2009
Author: djg
Date: Fri Jul 17 15:58:59 2009
New Revision: 76236
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=76236&view=rev
Log:
Eliminate yet another copy of getOpcode.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp?rev=76236&r1=76235&r2=76236&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/ScheduleDAGInstrs.cpp Fri Jul 17 15:58:59 2009
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
#define DEBUG_TYPE "sched-instrs"
#include "ScheduleDAGInstrs.h"
-#include "llvm/Constants.h"
+#include "llvm/Operator.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
@@ -46,25 +46,14 @@
ScheduleDAG::Run(bb, end);
}
-/// getOpcode - If this is an Instruction or a ConstantExpr, return the
-/// opcode value. Otherwise return UserOp1.
-static unsigned getOpcode(const Value *V) {
- if (const Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V))
- return I->getOpcode();
- if (const ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(V))
- return CE->getOpcode();
- // Use UserOp1 to mean there's no opcode.
- return Instruction::UserOp1;
-}
-
/// getUnderlyingObjectFromInt - This is the function that does the work of
/// looking through basic ptrtoint+arithmetic+inttoptr sequences.
static const Value *getUnderlyingObjectFromInt(const Value *V) {
do {
- if (const User *U = dyn_cast<User>(V)) {
+ if (const Operator *U = dyn_cast<Operator>(V)) {
// If we find a ptrtoint, we can transfer control back to the
// regular getUnderlyingObjectFromInt.
- if (getOpcode(U) == Instruction::PtrToInt)
+ if (U->getOpcode() == Instruction::PtrToInt)
return U->getOperand(0);
// If we find an add of a constant or a multiplied value, it's
// likely that the other operand will lead us to the base
@@ -72,9 +61,9 @@
// object address is somehow being computed bt the multiply,
// because our callers only care when the result is an
// identifibale object.
- if (getOpcode(U) != Instruction::Add ||
+ if (U->getOpcode() != Instruction::Add ||
(!isa<ConstantInt>(U->getOperand(1)) &&
- getOpcode(U->getOperand(1)) != Instruction::Mul))
+ Operator::getOpcode(U->getOperand(1)) != Instruction::Mul))
return V;
V = U->getOperand(0);
} else {
@@ -91,7 +80,7 @@
do {
V = V->getUnderlyingObject();
// If it found an inttoptr, use special code to continue climing.
- if (getOpcode(V) != Instruction::IntToPtr)
+ if (Operator::getOpcode(V) != Instruction::IntToPtr)
break;
const Value *O = getUnderlyingObjectFromInt(cast<User>(V)->getOperand(0));
// If that succeeded in finding a pointer, continue the search.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list