[llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc] Is it OK to backport this patch?

[Chris Lattner]

On Jul 10, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Rafael Espindola wrote:

>> Was the tree still GPL2?  What is the distinction between all files
>> still copyright and the tree being GPL2?  Was this because libstdc++
>> changed license well after the rest of GCC?  If so, it's ok.  If  
>> there
>> is something else going on, lets talk about it first.
>
> That is the case, yes. GCC itself changed license first. At the time
> the patch was committed libstdc++ files were still GPL2.

Great, thanks Rafael!

-Chris