[llvm-commits] [llvm] r61458 - /llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/PreAllocSplitting.cpp

Owen Anderson resistor at mac.com
Thu Jan 1 18:20:40 PST 2009


Possibly, but it's not done yet.  There's still some miscompilations  
to be sorted out.

--Owen

On Jan 1, 2009, at 6:08 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:

> Ok. Does it make sense to move the code out preallocsplitting?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Evan
>
> On Jan 1, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Owen Anderson wrote:
>
>> The goal is to use it to reconstruct the liveinterval in cases where
>> the splitting creates a new join point.
>>
>> --Owen
>>
>> On Jan 1, 2009, at 2:11 AM, Evan Cheng wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Owen,
>>>
>>> When do you envision this code will be used? I guess this is  
>>> intented
>>> to replace an old interval with a more precised one? Is it for
>>> performance benefit?
>>>
>>> Evan
>>>
>>> On Dec 28, 2008, at 1:48 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: resistor
>>>> Date: Sun Dec 28 15:48:48 2008
>>>> New Revision: 61458
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=61458&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Add prototype code for recomputing a live interval's ranges and
>>>> valnos through recursive phi construction.
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/PreAllocSplitting.cpp
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/PreAllocSplitting.cpp
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/PreAllocSplitting.cpp?rev=61458&r1=61457&r2=61458&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ===
>>>> ===
>>>> ===
>>>> =
>>>> = 
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/PreAllocSplitting.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/PreAllocSplitting.cpp Sun Dec 28  
>>>> 15:48:48
>>>> 2008
>>>> @@ -171,7 +171,15 @@
>>>>                          int& SS,
>>>>                          SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 4>& RefsInMBB);
>>>>  void RenumberValno(VNInfo* VN);
>>>> -  };
>>>> +    void ReconstructLiveInterval(LiveInterval* LI);
>>>> +    VNInfo* PerformPHIConstruction(MachineBasicBlock::iterator  
>>>> use,
>>>> +                                   LiveInterval* LI,
>>>> +            DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*,  
>>>> SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*,
>>>> 2> >& Defs,
>>>> +            DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*,  
>>>> SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*,
>>>> 2> >& Uses,
>>>> +                                      DenseMap<MachineInstr*,
>>>> VNInfo*>& NewVNs,
>>>> +                                DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*,
>>>> VNInfo*>& Visited,
>>>> +                                               bool toplevel =
>>>> false);
>>>> +};
>>>> } // end anonymous namespace
>>>>
>>>> char PreAllocSplitting::ID = 0;
>>>> @@ -577,6 +585,257 @@
>>>> return LastMI;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +/// PerformPHIConstruction - From properly set up use and def
>>>> lists, use a PHI
>>>> +/// construction algorithm to compute the ranges and valnos for an
>>>> interval.
>>>> +VNInfo* PreAllocSplitting::PerformPHIConstruction(
>>>> +
>>>> MachineBasicBlock::iterator use,
>>>> +
>>>> LiveInterval* LI,
>>>> +             DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*,
>>>> SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 2> >& Defs,
>>>> +             DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*,
>>>> SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 2> >& Uses,
>>>> +                                       DenseMap<MachineInstr*,
>>>> VNInfo*>& NewVNs,
>>>> +                                 DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*,
>>>> VNInfo*>& Visited,
>>>> +                                                        bool
>>>> toplevel) {
>>>> +  // Return memoized result if it's available.
>>>> +  if (Visited.count(use->getParent()))
>>>> +    return Visited[use->getParent()];
>>>> +
>>>> +  typedef DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*, SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*,
>>>> 2> > RegMap;
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Check if our block contains any uses or defs.
>>>> +  bool ContainsDefs = Defs.count(use->getParent());
>>>> +  bool ContainsUses = Uses.count(use->getParent());
>>>> +
>>>> +  VNInfo* ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Enumerate the cases of use/def contaning blocks.
>>>> +  if (!ContainsDefs && !ContainsUses) {
>>>> +  Fallback:
>>>> +    // NOTE: Because this is the fallback case from other cases,  
>>>> we
>>>> do NOT
>>>> +    // assume that we are not at toplevel here.
>>>> +
>>>> +    // If there are no uses or defs between our starting point and
>>>> the beginning
>>>> +    // of the block, then recursive perform phi construction on  
>>>> our
>>>> predecessors
>>>> +    MachineBasicBlock* MBB = use->getParent();
>>>> +    DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*, VNInfo*> IncomingVNs;
>>>> +    for (MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = MBB->pred_begin(),
>>>> +         PE = MBB->pred_end(); PI != PE; ++PI) {
>>>> +      VNInfo* Incoming = PerformPHIConstruction((*PI)->end(), LI,
>>>> Defs, Uses,
>>>> +                                                NewVNs, Visited,
>>>> false);
>>>> +      IncomingVNs[*PI] = Incoming;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    // If only one VNInfo came back from our predecessors, just  
>>>> use
>>>> that one...
>>>> +    if (IncomingVNs.size() == 1) {
>>>> +      ret = IncomingVNs.begin()->second;
>>>> +      unsigned StartIndex = LIs->getMBBStartIdx(use->getParent());
>>>> +      unsigned EndIndex = 0;
>>>> +      if (toplevel) {
>>>> +        EndIndex = LIs->getInstructionIndex(use);
>>>> +        EndIndex = LiveIntervals::getUseIndex(EndIndex);
>>>> +      } else
>>>> +        EndIndex = LIs->getMBBEndIdx(use->getParent());
>>>> +
>>>> +      LI->addRange(LiveRange(StartIndex, EndIndex, ret));
>>>> +    } else {
>>>> +      // Otherwise, merge the incoming VNInfos with a phi join.
>>>> Create a new
>>>> +      // VNInfo to represent the joined value.
>>>> +      for (DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*, VNInfo*>::iterator I =
>>>> +           IncomingVNs.begin(), E = IncomingVNs.end(); I != E; +
>>>> +I) {
>>>> +        I->second->hasPHIKill = true;
>>>> +        unsigned KillIndex = LIs->getMBBEndIdx(I->first);
>>>> +        LI->addKill(I->second, KillIndex);
>>>> +      }
>>>> +
>>>> +      unsigned StartIndex = LIs->getMBBStartIdx(use->getParent());
>>>> +      unsigned EndIndex = 0;
>>>> +      if (toplevel) {
>>>> +        EndIndex = LIs->getInstructionIndex(use);
>>>> +        EndIndex = LiveIntervals::getUseIndex(EndIndex);
>>>> +      } else
>>>> +        EndIndex = LIs->getMBBEndIdx(use->getParent());
>>>> +      ret = LI->getNextValue(StartIndex, /*FIXME*/ 0,
>>>> +                             LIs->getVNInfoAllocator());
>>>> +      LI->addRange(LiveRange(StartIndex, EndIndex, ret));
>>>> +    }
>>>> +  } else if (ContainsDefs && !ContainsUses) {
>>>> +    SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 2>& BlockDefs = Defs[use-
>>>>> getParent()];
>>>> +
>>>> +    // Search for the def in this block.  If we don't find it
>>>> before the
>>>> +    // instruction we care about, go to the fallback case.  Note
>>>> that that
>>>> +    // should never happen: this cannot be a toplevel block, so  
>>>> use
>>>> should
>>>> +    // always be an end() iterator.
>>>> +    assert(use == use->getParent()->end() && "No use marked in
>>>> toplevel block");
>>>> +
>>>> +    MachineBasicBlock::iterator walker = use;
>>>> +    --walker;
>>>> +    while (walker != use->getParent()->begin())
>>>> +      if (BlockDefs.count(walker)) {
>>>> +        break;
>>>> +      } else
>>>> +        --walker;
>>>> +
>>>> +    // Once we've found it, extend its VNInfo to our instruction.
>>>> +    unsigned DefIndex = LIs->getInstructionIndex(walker);
>>>> +    DefIndex = LiveIntervals::getDefIndex(DefIndex);
>>>> +    unsigned EndIndex = LIs->getMBBEndIdx(use->getParent());
>>>> +
>>>> +    ret = NewVNs[walker];
>>>> +    LI->addRange(LiveRange(DefIndex, EndIndex, ret));
>>>> +  } else if (!ContainsDefs && ContainsUses) {
>>>> +    SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 2>& BlockUses = Uses[use-
>>>>> getParent()];
>>>> +
>>>> +    // Search for the use in this block that precedes the
>>>> instruction we care
>>>> +    // about, going to the fallback case if we don't find it.
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (use == use->getParent()->begin())
>>>> +      goto Fallback;
>>>> +
>>>> +    MachineBasicBlock::iterator walker = use;
>>>> +    --walker;
>>>> +    bool found = false;
>>>> +    while (walker != use->getParent()->begin())
>>>> +      if (BlockUses.count(walker)) {
>>>> +        found = true;
>>>> +        break;
>>>> +      } else
>>>> +        --walker;
>>>> +
>>>> +    // Must check begin() too.
>>>> +    if (!found)
>>>> +      if (BlockUses.count(walker))
>>>> +        found = true;
>>>> +      else
>>>> +        goto Fallback;
>>>> +
>>>> +    unsigned UseIndex = LIs->getInstructionIndex(walker);
>>>> +    UseIndex = LiveIntervals::getUseIndex(UseIndex);
>>>> +    unsigned EndIndex = 0;
>>>> +    if (toplevel) {
>>>> +      EndIndex = LIs->getInstructionIndex(walker);
>>>> +      EndIndex = LiveIntervals::getUseIndex(EndIndex);
>>>> +    } else
>>>> +      EndIndex = LIs->getMBBEndIdx(use->getParent());
>>>> +
>>>> +    // Now, recursively phi construct the VNInfo for the use we
>>>> found,
>>>> +    // and then extend it to include the instruction we care about
>>>> +    ret = PerformPHIConstruction(walker, LI, Defs, Uses,
>>>> +                                 NewVNs, Visited, false);
>>>> +
>>>> +    // FIXME: Need to set kills properly for inter-block stuff.
>>>> +    if (toplevel) {
>>>> +      if (LI->isKill(ret, UseIndex)) LI->removeKill(ret,  
>>>> UseIndex);
>>>> +      LI->addKill(ret, EndIndex);
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    LI->addRange(LiveRange(UseIndex, EndIndex, ret));
>>>> +  } else if (ContainsDefs && ContainsUses){
>>>> +    SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 2>& BlockDefs = Defs[use-
>>>>> getParent()];
>>>> +    SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 2>& BlockUses = Uses[use-
>>>>> getParent()];
>>>> +
>>>> +    // This case is basically a merging of the two preceding case,
>>>> with the
>>>> +    // special note that checking for defs must take precedence
>>>> over checking
>>>> +    // for uses, because of two-address instructions.
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (use == use->getParent()->begin())
>>>> +      goto Fallback;
>>>> +
>>>> +    MachineBasicBlock::iterator walker = use;
>>>> +    --walker;
>>>> +    bool foundDef = false;
>>>> +    bool foundUse = false;
>>>> +    while (walker != use->getParent()->begin())
>>>> +      if (BlockDefs.count(walker)) {
>>>> +        foundDef = true;
>>>> +        break;
>>>> +      } else if (BlockUses.count(walker)) {
>>>> +        foundUse = true;
>>>> +        break;
>>>> +      } else
>>>> +        --walker;
>>>> +
>>>> +    // Must check begin() too.
>>>> +    if (!foundDef && !foundUse)
>>>> +      if (BlockDefs.count(walker))
>>>> +        foundDef = true;
>>>> +      else if (BlockUses.count(walker))
>>>> +        foundUse = true;
>>>> +      else
>>>> +        goto Fallback;
>>>> +
>>>> +    unsigned StartIndex = LIs->getInstructionIndex(walker);
>>>> +    StartIndex = foundDef ?
>>>> LiveIntervals::getDefIndex(StartIndex) :
>>>> +                             
>>>> LiveIntervals::getUseIndex(StartIndex);
>>>> +    unsigned EndIndex = 0;
>>>> +    if (toplevel) {
>>>> +      EndIndex = LIs->getInstructionIndex(walker);
>>>> +      EndIndex = LiveIntervals::getUseIndex(EndIndex);
>>>> +    } else
>>>> +      EndIndex = LIs->getMBBEndIdx(use->getParent());
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (foundDef)
>>>> +      ret = NewVNs[walker];
>>>> +    else
>>>> +      ret = PerformPHIConstruction(walker, LI, Defs, Uses,
>>>> +                                   NewVNs, Visited, false);
>>>> +
>>>> +    // FIXME: Need to set kills properly for inter-block stuff.
>>>> +    if (toplevel) {
>>>> +      if (foundUse && LI->isKill(ret, StartIndex))
>>>> +        LI->removeKill(ret, StartIndex);
>>>> +      LI->addKill(ret, EndIndex);
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    LI->addRange(LiveRange(StartIndex, EndIndex, ret));
>>>> +  }
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Memoize results so we don't have to recompute them.
>>>> +  if (!toplevel) Visited[use->getParent()] = ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +  return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/// ReconstructLiveInterval - Recompute a live interval from
>>>> scratch.
>>>> +void PreAllocSplitting::ReconstructLiveInterval(LiveInterval*  
>>>> LI) {
>>>> +  BumpPtrAllocator& Alloc = LIs->getVNInfoAllocator();
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Clear the old ranges and valnos;
>>>> +  LI->clear();
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Cache the uses and defs of the register
>>>> +  typedef DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*, SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*,
>>>> 2> > RegMap;
>>>> +  RegMap Defs, Uses;
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Keep track of the new VNs we're creating.
>>>> +  DenseMap<MachineInstr*, VNInfo*> NewVNs;
>>>> +  SmallPtrSet<VNInfo*, 2> PhiVNs;
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Cache defs, and create a new VNInfo for each def.
>>>> +  for (MachineRegisterInfo::def_iterator DI = MRI->def_begin(LI-
>>>>> reg),
>>>> +       DE = MRI->def_end(); DI != DE; ++DI) {
>>>> +    Defs[(*DI).getParent()].insert(&*DI);
>>>> +
>>>> +    unsigned DefIdx = LIs->getInstructionIndex(&*DI);
>>>> +    DefIdx = LiveIntervals::getDefIndex(DefIdx);
>>>> +
>>>> +    VNInfo* NewVN = LI->getNextValue(DefIdx, /*FIXME*/ 0, Alloc);
>>>> +    NewVNs[&*DI] = NewVN;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Cache uses as a separate pass from actually processing them.
>>>> +  for (MachineRegisterInfo::use_iterator UI = MRI->use_begin(LI-
>>>>> reg),
>>>> +       UE = MRI->use_end(); UI != UE; ++UI)
>>>> +    Uses[(*UI).getParent()].insert(&*UI);
>>>> +
>>>> +  // Now, actually process every use and use a phi construction
>>>> algorithm
>>>> +  // to walk from it to its reaching definitions, building VNInfos
>>>> along
>>>> +  // the way.
>>>> +  for (MachineRegisterInfo::use_iterator UI = MRI->use_begin(LI-
>>>>> reg),
>>>> +       UE = MRI->use_end(); UI != UE; ++UI) {
>>>> +    DenseMap<MachineBasicBlock*, VNInfo*> Visited;
>>>> +    PerformPHIConstruction(&*UI, LI, Defs, Uses, NewVNs, Visited,
>>>> true);
>>>> +  }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /// ShrinkWrapLiveInterval - Recursively traverse the predecessor
>>>> /// chain to find the new 'kills' and shrink wrap the live interval
>>>> to the
>>>> /// new kill indices.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits




More information about the llvm-commits mailing list