[llvm-commits] Patch: updated widen in LegalizeType

[Mon Ping Wang]

I flipped conditional and true/false values in the statement below.    
What I meant to say is that operand 0 and 1, lhs and rhs that are used  
in the comparison are not vectors but the result based on operand 2  
and 3 can be.

   -- Mon Ping

What I meant o say is the I thought the condition (operand 0 and 1)  
could be vectors.

On Dec 16, 2008, at 1:35 AM, Mon Ping Wang wrote:

> It looks like I misunderstood SELECT_CC.  I thought that the true and
> false values can be vectors if the comparions values are vectors but
> looking at what split does, they are not.  The getNode doesn't check
> if the true and false values are not vectors.   None of my test cases
> hits this instruction.