[llvm-commits] PATCH: Add Version.h and macros

[Chris Lattner]

On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:09 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> #define LLVM_RELEASE_VERSION 24
>
> For LLVM 2.4 etc?  Is there any specific reason to track branches?
>
> No, there is no particular reason to track branches (especially if  
> LLVM_API_VERSION is adopted). I thought it might make sense to  
> provide the full information given by the PACKAGE_VERSION define  
> autoconf generates. I don't see any particular reason not to provide  
> it.
>
> As far as LLVM_RELEASE_VERSION, I prefer to encode major and minor.

I agree, I just don't see a need to do it separately.

> What is LLVM_RELEASE_VERSION 210?


LLVM 21.0?

-Chris