[llvm-commits] [llvm] r56310 - /llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp
Chris Lattner
clattner at apple.com
Sun Sep 21 16:41:33 PDT 2008
On Sep 18, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Dan Gohman wrote:
> Author: djg
> Date: Thu Sep 18 13:22:32 2008
> New Revision: 56310
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=56310&view=rev
> Log:
> Don't consider instructions with implicit physical register
> defs to be necessarily live.
Why do defs of physical registers even matter? Can't you just look at
kill/dead markers?
-Chris
>
>
> Modified:
> llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp?rev=56310&r1=56309&r2=56310&view=diff
>
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> =
> ======================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp Thu Sep 18
> 13:22:32 2008
> @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@
> const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i);
> if (MO.isRegister() && MO.isDef()) {
> unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
> - if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg) ||
> + if ((!MO.isImplicit() &&
> + TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg)) ||
> !MRI.use_empty(Reg)) {
> // This def has a use. Don't delete the instruction!
> AllDefsDead = false;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list