[llvm-commits] [llvm] r50770 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopDeletion.cpp
Owen Anderson
resistor at mac.com
Tue May 6 13:55:17 PDT 2008
Author: resistor
Date: Tue May 6 15:55:16 2008
New Revision: 50770
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=50770&view=rev
Log:
We need to update PHIs containing the exiting block, not the exit block. We really should come up with better names for these.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopDeletion.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopDeletion.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopDeletion.cpp?rev=50770&r1=50769&r2=50770&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopDeletion.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopDeletion.cpp Tue May 6 15:55:16 2008
@@ -192,8 +192,9 @@
return false;
// Now that we know the removal is safe, remove the loop by changing the
- // branch from the preheader to go to the single exiting block.
+ // branch from the preheader to go to the single exit block.
BasicBlock* exitBlock = exitBlocks[0];
+ BasicBlock* exitingBlock = exitingBlocks[0];
// Because we're deleting a large chunk of code at once, the sequence in which
// we remove things is very important to avoid invalidation issues. Don't
@@ -218,7 +219,7 @@
// the preheader instead of the exiting block.
BasicBlock::iterator BI = exitBlock->begin();
while (PHINode* P = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BI)) {
- P->replaceUsesOfWith(exitBlock, preheader);
+ P->replaceUsesOfWith(exitingBlock, preheader);
BI++;
}
@@ -253,8 +254,12 @@
// NOTE: This iteration is safe because erasing the block does not remove its
// entry from the loop's block list. We do that in the next section.
for (Loop::block_iterator LI = L->block_begin(), LE = L->block_end();
- LI != LE; ++LI)
+ LI != LE; ++LI) {
+ for (Value::use_iterator UI = (*LI)->use_begin(), UE = (*LI)->use_end();
+ UI != UE; ++UI)
+ (*UI)->dump();
(*LI)->eraseFromParent();
+ }
// Finally, the blocks from loopinfo. This has to happen late because
// otherwise our loop iterators won't work.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list