[llvm-commits] [llvm] r49458 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/IPO/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Thu Apr 10 09:23:34 PDT 2008
On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:58 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> + // x pow(x, 0.5) sqrt(x)
>> + // ---------------------------------------------
>> + // -0.0 +0.0 -0.0
>> + // -inf +inf NaN
>
> looks like pow is broken. Is pow's behaviour documented
> anywhere? On my machine the man page says:
>
> The pow() function can return the following error:
>
> EDOM The argument x is negative and y is not an integral
> value. This would result in a complex num‐
> ber.
>
> Are you sure errno is not being set by pow in these cases?
Incidentally, gcc also does not perform this xform unless 'unsafe math
optzns' are enabled.
-Chris
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list