[llvm-commits] [llvm] r49458 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/IPO/SimplifyLibCalls.cpp
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Thu Apr 10 09:21:24 PDT 2008
On Apr 10, 2008, at 4:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>>>> + // x pow(x, 0.5) sqrt(x)
>>>> + // ---------------------------------------------
>>>> + // -0.0 +0.0 -0.0
>>>> + // -inf +inf NaN
>>>
>>> looks like pow is broken. Is pow's behaviour documented
>>> anywhere? On my machine the man page says:
>>>
>>> The pow() function can return the following error:
>>>
>>> EDOM The argument x is negative and y is not an integral
>>> value. This would result in a complex num‐
>>> ber.
>>>
-0.0 is negative, but it *is* an integral value, so EDOM doesn't apply.
-Chris
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list