[llvm-commits] Fwd: Patch for review: Speeding up ScheduleDAG computations

[David Greene]

On Tuesday 04 March 2008 11:30, Evan Cheng wrote:

> > I'd like to understand better why Evan and Chris are some much against
> > std::set? From some mails I got the impression that std::set
> > implementation is very inefficient on Darwin or PowerPC? Is it
> > correct? Or do you dislike that fact that std::set uses dynamic memory
> > allocation extensively?
>
> Right, it's very malloc intensive. That's the main issue.

So why not define an allocator for it?

                                               -Dave