[llvm-commits] [llvm] r46764 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/CallingConv.h lib/Target/X86/X86CallingConv.td lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp

Chris Lattner clattner at apple.com
Wed Feb 6 10:48:51 PST 2008

>>> Attaching this to the Function node went smoothly enough, but I
>>> actually need it on the Return node, which it appears isn't
>>> supported in the current IR, but is in the the machine-level RET
>>> node.  I could transfer the info from the Function node to the RET
>>> node at some point, or even reference the Function node from the
>>> code that handles RET I suppose, but it seems cleaner to change the
>>> IR; which would break binary compatibility.   Considering that this
>>> works as is and is not all that important to begin with, I'm
>>> thinking it's best to wait until we can change the IR and do it
>>> right.  Thoughts?
>> From the current SelectionDAG you can get a pointer to the Function
>> object, which should have the attribute.  Lowering for an ISD::RET
>> can thus getting it from following this chain,
> I know, I just don't think that's the right way to do it.

Why not?


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list