[llvm-commits] [llvm] r43717 - /llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl5.html
Chris Lattner
sabre at nondot.org
Mon Nov 5 09:52:04 PST 2007
Author: lattner
Date: Mon Nov 5 11:52:04 2007
New Revision: 43717
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=43717&view=rev
Log:
fix typo
Modified:
llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl5.html
Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl5.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl5.html?rev=43717&r1=43716&r2=43717&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl5.html (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl5.html Mon Nov 5 11:52:04 2007
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@
<p>The final line here is quite subtle, but is very important. The basic issue
is that when we create the Phi node in the merge block, we need to set up the
block/value pairs that indicate how the Phi will work. Importantly, the Phi
-node expects to have an extry for each predecessor of the block in the CFG. Why
+node expects to have an entry for each predecessor of the block in the CFG. Why
then are we getting the current block when we just set it to ThenBB 5 lines
above? The problem is that the "Then" expression may actually itself change the
block that the Builder is emitting into if, for example, it contains a nested
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list