[llvm-commits] [llvm] r43682 - /llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl7.html

[Chris Lattner]

Author: lattner
Date: Sun Nov  4 13:42:13 2007
New Revision: 43682

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=43682&view=rev
Log:
fix typos


Modified:
    llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl7.html

Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl7.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl7.html?rev=43682&r1=43681&r2=43682&view=diff

==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl7.html (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/docs/tutorial/LangImpl7.html Sun Nov  4 13:42:13 2007
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
 in SSA form, it does not require (or permit) memory objects to be in SSA form.
 In the example above, note that the loads from G and H are direct accesses to
 G and H: they are not renamed or versioned.  This differs from some other
-compiler systems, which does try to version memory objects.  In LLVM, instead of
+compiler systems, which do try to version memory objects.  In LLVM, instead of
 encoding dataflow analysis of memory into the LLVM IR, it is handled with <a 
 href="../WritingAnLLVMPass.html">Analysis Passes</a> which are computed on
 demand.</p>
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
 
 <p>
 All of these properties are easy to satisfy for most imperative languages, and
-we'll illustrated this below with Kaleidoscope.  The final question you may be
+we'll illustrate this below with Kaleidoscope.  The final question you may be
 asking is: should I bother with this nonsense for my front-end?  Wouldn't it be
 better if I just did SSA construction directly, avoiding use of the mem2reg
 optimization pass?  In short, we strongly recommend that use you this technique