[llvm-commits] [llvm] r42367 - in /llvm/trunk: Xcode/LLVM.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj bindings/ocaml/Makefile.ocaml bindings/ocaml/bitwriter/Makefile bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.ml bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.mli bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm_ocaml.c include/llvm-c/Core.h include/llvm/CHelpers.h lib/VMCore/Core.cpp test/Bindings/Ocaml/bitwriter.ml test/Bindings/Ocaml/vmcore.ml

[Gordon Henriksen]

On 2007-09-28, at 21:02, Gordon Henriksen wrote:

> On Sep 28, 2007, at 16:18, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=42367&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Added C and Ocaml bindings for functions, basic blocks, and
>>> instruction creation. No support yet for instruction introspection.
>>>
>>> Also eliminated allocas from the Ocaml bindings for portability,
>>> and avoided unnecessary casts.
>>>
>>
>>> ==================================================================== 
>>> ==
>>> ========
>>> --- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CHelpers.h (original)
>>> +++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/CHelpers.h Wed Sep 26 15:56:12 2007
>>
>> Hi Gordon,
>>
>> I think it makes sense for CHelpers.h to move into include/llvm/ 
>> Support instead of include/llvm.  What do you think?
>
> Agreed; it was on my to-do list. I'd placed it here under the  
> assumption that there wasn't anything LLVM-specific in Support, but  
> I later saw that I was mistaken.

Done. I suppose I could get rid of this header entirely by putting  
these silly things in llvm-c protected by #ifdef __cplusplus. Too nutty?

— Gordon

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20070928/e20e3cb2/attachment.html>