[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm-www/DevMtgMay2007.html
Owen Anderson
resistor at mac.com
Sun Apr 1 14:08:10 PDT 2007
Changes in directory llvm-www:
DevMtgMay2007.html updated: 1.21 -> 1.22
---
Log message:
Fix a some formatting.
---
Diffs of the changes: (+10 -10)
DevMtgMay2007.html | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: llvm-www/DevMtgMay2007.html
diff -u llvm-www/DevMtgMay2007.html:1.21 llvm-www/DevMtgMay2007.html:1.22
--- llvm-www/DevMtgMay2007.html:1.21 Sun Apr 1 16:01:30 2007
+++ llvm-www/DevMtgMay2007.html Sun Apr 1 16:07:53 2007
@@ -135,21 +135,21 @@
originator followed by 10 minutes of discussion. This will allow 6 issues to
be discussed in this time slot.
<table class="www">
- <tr><th>Suggested By</th><th>Issue or Discussion Topic</th></tr>
- <tr><th>Owen Anderson</th><th><b>Integration of HLVM into LLVM</b> - its
+ <tr><th>Suggested By</th><th>Issue or Discussion Topic</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>Owen Anderson</td><td><b>Integration of HLVM into LLVM</b> - its
future as an LLVM subproject, and plans for making LLVM more accessible
- to scripting and higher level language front ends.</th></tr>
- <tr><th>Owen Anderson</th><th><b>Future development practices</b>: with a
+ to scripting and higher level language front ends.</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>Owen Anderson</td><td><b>Future development practices</b>: with a
burgeoning number of clients and wider adoption, do we want more orgnized
- development practices? i.e. release focuses or something?</th></tr>
- <tr><th>Owen Anderson</th><th><b>Adoption Goals</b>: while our adoption has
+ development practices? i.e. release focuses or something?</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>Owen Anderson</td><td><b>Adoption Goals</b>: while our adoption has
increased greatly recently, we're still tiny compared to GCC. What are our
- future growth and adoption plans?</th></tr>
- <tr><th>Owen Anderson</th><th><b>Project Management</b>: We have an oversight
+ future growth and adoption plans?</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>Owen Anderson</td><td><b>Project Management</b>: We have an oversight
group right now. Do we want more organization? Corporate interest have
given us some great things, but sometimes secrecy makes things
difficult for those not involved; should there be an LLVM Foundation
- in our (distant?) future?</th></tr>
+ in our (distant?) future?</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
@@ -228,6 +228,6 @@
src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss" alt="Valid CSS!"></a>
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401" alt="Valid HTML 4.01!"></a>
-<br/>Last modified: $Date: 2007/04/01 21:01:30 $
+<br/>Last modified: $Date: 2007/04/01 21:07:53 $
</address>
<!--#include virtual="footer.incl" -->
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list