[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/docs/AliasAnalysis.html DeveloperPolicy.html ExceptionHandling.html GarbageCollection.html LangRef.html ProgrammersManual.html SystemLibrary.html

[Duncan Sands]

> > There is no checkpoints section, there is only "Data Layout".  However
> > "Data Layout" talks only of checkpoints.  Would you like me to delete it?
...
> Yes, delete that whole <div class="doc_text"> and the doc_subsection too
> if that's the only paragraph in it. The checkpoint thing is not
> supported any more.  I know this isn't your change, but since you're in
> there ... :)

Done.

> > > > -        <tr><td><tt>void</tt></td><td>No value</td></tr>
> > > > +        <tr><td><tt><a name="t_void">void</a></tt></td><td>No value</td></tr>
> > > >          <tr><td><tt>i8</tt></td><td>8-bit value</td></tr>
> > > >          <tr><td><tt>i32</tt></td><td>32-bit value</td></tr>
> > > >          <tr><td><tt>float</tt></td><td>32-bit floating point value</td></tr>
> > > 
> > > Why not put in links for the other types?
> > 
> > Because they have their own sections with an anchor, eg t_integer refers to the
> > section on integers.  Void is the only type that doesn't have its own section.
> > Probably it should get one.
> 
> Oh, yeah, sorry, thought that was an href="#t_void" you put in there. 
> 
> In this case, this link isn't good. We don't want a link coming to this
> table because itw ill confuse the reader. Please add a section near
> t_integer for t_void.  Then, make all of these table entries have links
> to the type's section.

Actually, the integer and floating point types don't have their own section.
#t_integer and #t_floating refer to the entries in the next table.  I don't
think leaving t_void anchor where it is will confuse anyone.

Ciao,

Duncan.