[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/docs/AliasAnalysis.html DeveloperPolicy.html ExceptionHandling.html GarbageCollection.html LangRef.html ProgrammersManual.html SystemLibrary.html

[Reid Spencer]

Duncan, 

A Couple notes ..

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 07:22 -0500, Duncan Sands wrote:

> 
> Index: llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html
> diff -u llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html:1.37 llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html:1.38
> --- llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html:1.37	Thu Mar  1 20:57:34 2007
> +++ llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html	Fri Mar 30 07:22:09 2007
> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@
>      bug being fixed or feature being implemented is in the llvm-gcc C++
>      front-end, in which case it must be written in C++).</li>
>      <li>Test cases, especially for regressions, should be reduced as much as 
> -    possible, by <a href="CommandGuide/html/bugpoint.html">bugpoint</a> or
> +    possible, by <a href="Bugpoint.html">bugpoint</a> or

These aren't the same document. If the bugpoint.html document isn't
there its an artifact of not generating the HTML version from the POD
version.  This isn't a huge deal for the link, but do we have a larger
issue generating the command pages?
 

> 
> Index: llvm/docs/LangRef.html
> diff -u llvm/docs/LangRef.html:1.217 llvm/docs/LangRef.html:1.218
> --- llvm/docs/LangRef.html:1.217	Tue Mar 27 21:46:29 2007
> +++ llvm/docs/LangRef.html	Fri Mar 30 07:22:09 2007
> @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
>        <li><a href="#paramattrs">Parameter Attributes</a></li>
>        <li><a href="#moduleasm">Module-Level Inline Assembly</a></li>
>        <li><a href="#datalayout">Data Layout</a></li>
> -      <li><a href="#checkpoint">Check Points</a></li>

Can you delete the CheckPoints section too? Its going away soon, when
PR1289 is closed.

Thx.

>      </ol>
>    </li>
>    <li><a href="#typesystem">Type System</a>
> @@ -886,7 +885,7 @@
>        <table>
>          <tbody>
>          <tr><th>Type</th><th>Description</th></tr>
> -        <tr><td><tt>void</tt></td><td>No value</td></tr>
> +        <tr><td><tt><a name="t_void">void</a></tt></td><td>No value</td></tr>
>          <tr><td><tt>i8</tt></td><td>8-bit value</td></tr>
>          <tr><td><tt>i32</tt></td><td>32-bit value</td></tr>
>          <tr><td><tt>float</tt></td><td>32-bit floating point value</td></tr>

Why not put in links for the other types?


Thanks,

Reid.