[llvm-commits] Major regressions

[Jeff Cohen]

Well, I'm using the most recent version of both llvm and llvm-gcc 
(revision 254).  21 of the failures are ARM, but I don't care about 
those.  llvm-test is still running, but it's on track to matching the 
275 failures I got the last time I ran it.

I'm not going to switch to Linux or OS X or even 32-bit FreeBSD, and I'm 
not going to spend the time figuring out why LLVM hates 64-bit 
FreeBSD--especially as it's getting worse, not better--and it's clear no 
one else is going to spend the time either.  So I'm putting LLVM back on 
hold until later this year and hopefully the situation will be better then.

Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 12:01 -0800, Jeff Cohen wrote:
>   
>> In the two weeks since I last ran them, the regression tests have gone 
>> from 4 to 63 unexpected failures.  Is this expected?
>>     
>
> No, TOT gives me 6 right now .. 5 in the new ARM backend (be patient)
> and 1 in the X86 backend.
>
>   
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>     
>
>
>
>
>