[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailDuplication.cpp
Chris Lattner
lattner at cs.uiuc.edu
Thu Sep 7 14:30:29 PDT 2006
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar:
TailDuplication.cpp updated: 1.30 -> 1.31
---
Log message:
Throttle back tail duplication to avoid creating really ugly sequences of code.
For Transforms/TailDup/if-tail-dup.ll, f.e., it produces:
_foo:
movl 8(%esp), %eax
movl 4(%esp), %ecx
testl $1, %ecx
je LBB1_2 #cond_next
LBB1_1: #cond_true
movl $1, (%eax)
LBB1_2: #cond_next
testl $2, %ecx
je LBB1_4 #cond_next10
LBB1_3: #cond_true6
movl $1, 4(%eax)
LBB1_4: #cond_next10
testl $4, %ecx
je LBB1_6 #cond_next18
LBB1_5: #cond_true14
movl $1, 8(%eax)
LBB1_6: #cond_next18
testl $8, %ecx
je LBB1_8 #return
LBB1_7: #cond_true22
movl $1, 12(%eax)
ret
LBB1_8: #return
ret
instead of:
_foo:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
testl $2, %eax
sete %cl
movl 8(%esp), %edx
testl $1, %eax
je LBB1_2 #cond_next
LBB1_1: #cond_true
movl $1, (%edx)
testb %cl, %cl
jne LBB1_4 #cond_next10
jmp LBB1_3 #cond_true6
LBB1_2: #cond_next
testb %cl, %cl
jne LBB1_4 #cond_next10
LBB1_3: #cond_true6
movl $1, 4(%edx)
testl $4, %eax
je LBB1_6 #cond_next18
jmp LBB1_5 #cond_true14
LBB1_4: #cond_next10
testl $4, %eax
je LBB1_6 #cond_next18
LBB1_5: #cond_true14
movl $1, 8(%edx)
testl $8, %eax
je LBB1_8 #return
jmp LBB1_7 #cond_true22
LBB1_6: #cond_next18
testl $8, %eax
je LBB1_8 #return
LBB1_7: #cond_true22
movl $1, 12(%edx)
ret
LBB1_8: #return
ret
---
Diffs of the changes: (+19 -0)
TailDuplication.cpp | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
Index: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailDuplication.cpp
diff -u llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailDuplication.cpp:1.30 llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailDuplication.cpp:1.31
--- llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailDuplication.cpp:1.30 Sun Aug 27 17:42:52 2006
+++ llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/TailDuplication.cpp Thu Sep 7 16:30:15 2006
@@ -127,6 +127,25 @@
for (; PI != PE; ++PI)
if (TooMany-- == 0) return false;
}
+
+ // Finally, if this unconditional branch is a fall-through, be careful about
+ // tail duplicating it. In particular, we don't want to taildup it if the
+ // original block will still be there after taildup is completed: doing so
+ // would eliminate the fall-through, requiring unconditional branches.
+ Function::iterator DestI = Dest;
+ if (&*--DestI == BI->getParent()) {
+ // The uncond branch is a fall-through. Tail duplication of the block is
+ // will eliminate the fall-through-ness and end up cloning the terminator
+ // at the end of the Dest block. Since the original Dest block will
+ // continue to exist, this means that one or the other will not be able to
+ // fall through. One typical example that this helps with is code like:
+ // if (a)
+ // foo();
+ // if (b)
+ // foo();
+ // Cloning the 'if b' block into the end of the first foo block is messy.
+ return false;
+ }
return true;
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list