[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
Jim Laskey
jlaskey at apple.com
Fri Aug 4 11:10:27 PDT 2006
Changes in directory llvm/docs:
WritingAnLLVMPass.html updated: 1.44 -> 1.45
---
Log message:
Added how to add machine passes to command line options.
---
Diffs of the changes: (+217 -78)
WritingAnLLVMPass.html | 295 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
Index: llvm/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html
diff -u llvm/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html:1.44 llvm/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html:1.45
--- llvm/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html:1.44 Mon Mar 13 23:39:39 2006
+++ llvm/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html Fri Aug 4 13:10:12 2006
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@
<ul>
<li><a href="#releaseMemory">The <tt>releaseMemory</tt> method</a></li>
</ul></li>
+ <li><a href="#registering">Registering dynamically loaded passes</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li><a href="#registering_existing">Using existing registries</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#registering_new">Creating new registries</a></li>
+ </ul></li>
<li><a href="#debughints">Using GDB with dynamically loaded passes</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#breakpoint">Setting a breakpoint in your pass</a></li>
@@ -97,7 +102,8 @@
</ol>
<div class="doc_author">
- <p>Written by <a href="mailto:sabre at nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a></p>
+ <p>Written by <a href="mailto:sabre at nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a>,
+ <a href="mailto:jlaskey at apple.com">Jim Laskey</a></p>
</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
@@ -163,7 +169,7 @@
copy the following into <tt>Makefile</tt>:</p>
<hr/>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
# Makefile for hello pass
# Path to top level of LLVM heirarchy
@@ -181,7 +187,7 @@
# Include the makefile implementation stuff
include $(LEVEL)/Makefile.common
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>This makefile specifies that all of the <tt>.cpp</tt> files in the current
directory are to be compiled and linked together into a
@@ -205,10 +211,10 @@
<p>Now that we have a way to compile our new pass, we just have to write it.
Start out with:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>#include</b> "<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/Pass_8h-source.html">llvm/Pass.h</a>"
<b>#include</b> "<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/Function_8h-source.html">llvm/Function.h</a>"
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Which are needed because we are writing a <tt><a
href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Pass.html">Pass</a></tt>, and
@@ -216,18 +222,18 @@
href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Function.html">Function</a></tt>'s.</p>
<p>Next we have:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>using namespace llvm;</b>
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>... which is required because the functions from the include files
live in the llvm namespace.
</p>
<p>Next we have:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>namespace</b> {
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>... which starts out an anonymous namespace. Anonymous namespaces are to C++
what the "<tt>static</tt>" keyword is to C (at global scope). It makes the
@@ -237,9 +243,9 @@
<p>Next, we declare our pass itself:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>struct</b> Hello : <b>public</b> <a href="#FunctionPass">FunctionPass</a> {
-</pre><p>
+</pre></div><p>
<p>This declares a "<tt>Hello</tt>" class that is a subclass of <tt><a
href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1FunctionPass.html">FunctionPass</a></tt>.
@@ -248,13 +254,13 @@
href="#FunctionPass"><tt>FunctionPass</tt></a>'s operate a function at a
time.</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> <a href="#runOnFunction">runOnFunction</a>(Function &F) {
std::cerr << "<i>Hello: </i>" << F.getName() << "\n";
<b>return false</b>;
}
}; <i>// end of struct Hello</i>
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>We declare a "<a href="#runOnFunction"><tt>runOnFunction</tt></a>" method,
which overloads an abstract virtual method inherited from <a
@@ -262,10 +268,10 @@
to do our thing, so we just print out our message with the name of each
function.</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
RegisterOpt<Hello> X("<i>hello</i>", "<i>Hello World Pass</i>");
} <i>// end of anonymous namespace</i>
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Lastly, we register our class <tt>Hello</tt>, giving it a command line
argument "<tt>hello</tt>", and a name "<tt>Hello World Pass</tt>". There are
@@ -275,7 +281,7 @@
<p>As a whole, the <tt>.cpp</tt> file looks like:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>#include</b> "<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/Pass_8h-source.html">llvm/Pass.h</a>"
<b>#include</b> "<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/Function_8h-source.html">llvm/Function.h</a>"
@@ -291,7 +297,7 @@
RegisterOpt<Hello> X("<i>hello</i>", "<i>Hello World Pass</i>");
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Now that it's all together, compile the file with a simple "<tt>gmake</tt>"
command in the local directory and you should get a new
@@ -320,12 +326,12 @@
through our transformation like this (or course, any bytecode file will
work):</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so -hello < hello.bc > /dev/null
Hello: __main
Hello: puts
Hello: main
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The '<tt>-load</tt>' option specifies that '<tt>opt</tt>' should load your
pass as a shared object, which makes '<tt>-hello</tt>' a valid command line
@@ -337,7 +343,7 @@
<p>To see what happened to the other string you registered, try running
<tt>opt</tt> with the <tt>--help</tt> option:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so --help
OVERVIEW: llvm .bc -> .bc modular optimizer
@@ -354,7 +360,7 @@
-inline - Function Integration/Inlining
-instcombine - Combine redundant instructions
...
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The pass name get added as the information string for your pass, giving some
documentation to users of <tt>opt</tt>. Now that you have a working pass, you
@@ -365,7 +371,7 @@
the execution time of your pass along with the other passes you queue up. For
example:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so -hello -time-passes < hello.bc > /dev/null
Hello: __main
Hello: puts
@@ -381,7 +387,7 @@
0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0013 ( 2.7%) Module Verifier
<b> 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0000 ( 0.0%) 0.0033 ( 6.9%) Hello World Pass</b>
0.0100 (100.0%) 0.0100 (100.0%) 0.0200 (100.0%) 0.0479 (100.0%) TOTAL
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>As you can see, our implementation above is pretty fast :). The additional
passes listed are automatically inserted by the '<tt>opt</tt>' tool to verify
@@ -467,9 +473,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> runOnModule(Module &M) = 0;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>runOnModule</tt> method performs the interesting work of the pass.
It should return true if the module was modified by the transformation and
@@ -535,9 +541,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doInitialization(Module &M);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doIninitialize</tt> method is allowed to do most of the things that
<tt>CallGraphSCCPass</tt>'s are not allowed to do. They can add and remove
@@ -556,9 +562,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> runOnSCC(const std::vector<CallGraphNode *> &SCCM) = 0;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>runOnSCC</tt> method performs the interesting work of the pass, and
should return true if the module was modified by the transformation, false
@@ -574,9 +580,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doFinalization(Module &M);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doFinalization</tt> method is an infrequently used method that is
called when the pass framework has finished calling <a
@@ -625,9 +631,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doInitialization(Module &M);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doIninitialize</tt> method is allowed to do most of the things that
<tt>FunctionPass</tt>'s are not allowed to do. They can add and remove
@@ -653,9 +659,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> runOnFunction(Function &F) = 0;
-</pre><p>
+</pre></div><p>
<p>The <tt>runOnFunction</tt> method must be implemented by your subclass to do
the transformation or analysis work of your pass. As usual, a true value should
@@ -671,9 +677,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doFinalization(Module &M);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doFinalization</tt> method is an infrequently used method that is
called when the pass framework has finished calling <a
@@ -719,9 +725,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doInitialization(Function &F);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doIninitialize</tt> method is allowed to do most of the things that
<tt>BasicBlockPass</tt>'s are not allowed to do, but that
@@ -740,9 +746,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> runOnBasicBlock(BasicBlock &BB) = 0;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Override this function to do the work of the <tt>BasicBlockPass</tt>. This
function is not allowed to inspect or modify basic blocks other than the
@@ -759,9 +765,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> doFinalization(Function &F);
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>doFinalization</tt> method is an infrequently used method that is
called when the pass framework has finished calling <a
@@ -805,9 +811,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual bool</b> runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) = 0;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p><tt>runOnMachineFunction</tt> can be considered the main entry point of a
<tt>MachineFunctionPass</tt>; that is, you should override this method to do the
@@ -877,9 +883,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual void</b> print(std::ostream &O, <b>const</b> Module *M) <b>const</b>;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>print</tt> method must be implemented by "analyses" in order to print
a human readable version of the analysis results. This is useful for debugging
@@ -927,9 +933,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual void</b> getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &Info) <b>const</b>;
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>By implementing the <tt>getAnalysisUsage</tt> method, the required and
invalidated sets may be specified for your transformation. The implementation
@@ -1008,24 +1014,24 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<i>// This is an example implementation from an analysis, which does not modify
// the program at all, yet has a prerequisite.</i>
<b>void</b> <a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1PostDominanceFrontier.html">PostDominanceFrontier</a>::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) <b>const</b> {
AU.setPreservesAll();
AU.addRequired<<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1PostDominatorTree.html">PostDominatorTree</a>>();
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>and:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<i>// This example modifies the program, but does not modify the CFG</i>
<b>void</b> <a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/structLICM.html">LICM</a>::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) <b>const</b> {
AU.setPreservesCFG();
AU.addRequired<<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1LoopInfo.html">LoopInfo</a>>();
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
</div>
@@ -1042,12 +1048,12 @@
method. It takes a single template argument that specifies which pass class you
want, and returns a reference to that pass. For example:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
bool LICM::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
LoopInfo &LI = getAnalysis<LoopInfo>();
...
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>This method call returns a reference to the pass desired. You may get a
runtime assertion failure if you attempt to get an analysis that you did not
@@ -1062,13 +1068,13 @@
<tt>getAnalysisToUpdate</tt> method, which returns a pointer to the analysis if
it is active. For example:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
...
if (DominatorSet *DS = getAnalysisToUpdate<DominatorSet>()) {
<i>// A DominatorSet is active. This code will update it.</i>
}
...
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
</div>
@@ -1163,14 +1169,14 @@
Unlike registration of passes, there is no command line argument to be specified
for the Analysis Group Interface itself, because it is "abstract":</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>static</b> RegisterAnalysisGroup<<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1AliasAnalysis.html">AliasAnalysis</a>> A("<i>Alias Analysis</i>");
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Once the analysis is registered, passes can declare that they are valid
implementations of the interface by using the following code:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>namespace</b> {
//<i> Analysis Group implementations <b>must</b> be registered normally...</i>
RegisterOpt<FancyAA>
@@ -1179,7 +1185,7 @@
//<i> Declare that we implement the AliasAnalysis interface</i>
RegisterAnalysisGroup<<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1AliasAnalysis.html">AliasAnalysis</a>, FancyAA> C;
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>This just shows a class <tt>FancyAA</tt> that is registered normally, then
uses the <tt>RegisterAnalysisGroup</tt> template to "join" the <tt><a
@@ -1188,7 +1194,7 @@
this template. A single pass may join multiple different analysis groups with
no problem.</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>namespace</b> {
//<i> Analysis Group implementations <b>must</b> be registered normally...</i>
RegisterOpt<<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/structBasicAliasAnalysis.html">BasicAliasAnalysis</a>>
@@ -1197,7 +1203,7 @@
//<i> Declare that we implement the AliasAnalysis interface</i>
RegisterAnalysisGroup<<a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1AliasAnalysis.html">AliasAnalysis</a>, <a href="http://llvm.org/doxygen/structBasicAliasAnalysis.html">BasicAliasAnalysis</a>, <b>true</b>> E;
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Here we show how the default implementation is specified (using the extra
argument to the <tt>RegisterAnalysisGroup</tt> template). There must be exactly
@@ -1290,7 +1296,7 @@
how our <a href="#basiccode">Hello World</a> pass interacts with other passes.
Lets try it out with the <tt>gcse</tt> and <tt>licm</tt> passes:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so -gcse -licm --debug-pass=Structure < hello.bc > /dev/null
Module Pass Manager
Function Pass Manager
@@ -1308,7 +1314,7 @@
-- Module Verifier
Bytecode Writer
--Bytecode Writer
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>This output shows us when passes are constructed and when the analysis
results are known to be dead (prefixed with '<tt>--</tt>'). Here we see that
@@ -1327,7 +1333,7 @@
<p>Lets see how this changes when we run the <a href="#basiccode">Hello
World</a> pass in between the two passes:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so -gcse -hello -licm --debug-pass=Structure < hello.bc > /dev/null
Module Pass Manager
Function Pass Manager
@@ -1352,23 +1358,23 @@
Hello: __main
Hello: puts
Hello: main
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Here we see that the <a href="#basiccode">Hello World</a> pass has killed the
Dominator Set pass, even though it doesn't modify the code at all! To fix this,
we need to add the following <a
href="#getAnalysisUsage"><tt>getAnalysisUsage</tt></a> method to our pass:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<i>// We don't modify the program, so we preserve all analyses</i>
<b>virtual void</b> getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) <b>const</b> {
AU.setPreservesAll();
}
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Now when we run our pass, we get this output:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ opt -load ../../../Debug/lib/Hello.so -gcse -hello -licm --debug-pass=Structure < hello.bc > /dev/null
Pass Arguments: -gcse -hello -licm
Module Pass Manager
@@ -1392,7 +1398,7 @@
Hello: __main
Hello: puts
Hello: main
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Which shows that we don't accidentally invalidate dominator information
anymore, and therefore do not have to compute it twice.</p>
@@ -1406,9 +1412,9 @@
<div class="doc_text">
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
<b>virtual void</b> releaseMemory();
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>The <tt>PassManager</tt> automatically determines when to compute analysis
results, and how long to keep them around for. Because the lifetime of the pass
@@ -1427,6 +1433,139 @@
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
<div class="doc_section">
+ <a name="registering">Registering dynamically loaded passes</a>
+</div>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p><i>Size matters</i> when constructing production quality tools using llvm,
+both for the purposes of distribution, and for regulating the resident code size
+when running on the target system. Therefore, it becomes desirable to
+selectively use some passes, while omitting others and maintain the flexibility
+to change configurations later on. You want to be able to do all this, and,
+provide feedback to the user. This is where pass registration comes into
+play.</p>
+
+<p>The fundamental mechanisms for pass registration are the
+<tt>MachinePassRegistry</tt> class and subclasses of
+<tt>MachinePassRegistryNode</tt>.</p>
+
+<p>An instance of <tt>MachinePassRegistry</tt> is used to maintain a list of
+<tt>MachinePassRegistryNode</tt> objects. This instance maintains the list and
+communicates additions and deletions to the command line interface.</p>
+
+<p>An instance of <tt>MachinePassRegistryNode</tt> subclass is used to maintain
+information provided about a particular pass. This information includes the
+command line name, the command help string and the address of the function used
+to create an instance of the pass. A global static constructor of one of these
+instances <i>registers</i> with a corresponding <tt>MachinePassRegistry</tt>,
+the static destructor <i>unregisters</i>. Thus a pass that is statically linked
+in the tool will be registered at start up. A dynamically loaded pass will
+register on load and unregister at unload.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="registering_existing">Using existing registries</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>There are predefined registries to track instruction scheduling
+(<tt>RegisterScheduler</tt>) and register allocation (<tt>RegisterRegAlloc</tt>)
+machine passes. Here we will describe how to <i>register</i> a register
+allocator machine pass.</p>
+
+<p>Implement your register allocator machine pass. In your register allocator
+.cpp file add the following include;</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+ #include ""llvm/CodeGen/RegAllocRegistry.h""
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>Also in your register allocator .cpp file, define a creator function in the
+form; </p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+ FunctionPass *createMyRegisterAllocator() {
+ return new MyRegisterAllocator();
+ }
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>Note that the signature of this function should match the type of
+<tt>RegisterRegAlloc::FunctionPassCtor</tt>. In the same file add the
+"installing" declaration, in the form;</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+ static RegisterRegAlloc myRegAlloc("myregalloc",
+ " my register allocator help string",
+ createMyRegisterAllocator);
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>Note the two spaces prior to the help string produces a tidy result on the
+--help query.</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+$ llc --help
+ ...
+ -regalloc - Register allocator to use: (default = linearscan)
+ =linearscan - linear scan register allocator
+ =local - local register allocator
+ =simple - simple register allocator
+ =myregalloc - my register allocator help string
+ ...
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>And that's it. The user is now free to use <tt>-regalloc=myregalloc</tt> as
+an option. Registering instruction schedulers is similar except use the
+<tt>RegisterRegAlloc</tt> class. Note that the
+<tt>RegisterRegAlloc::FunctionPassCtor</tt> is significantly different from
+<tt>RegisterRegAlloc::FunctionPassCtor</tt>.</p>
+
+<p>To force the load/linking of your register allocator into the llc/lli tools,
+add your creator function's global declaration to "Passes.h" and add a "pseudo"
+call line to <tt>llvm/Codegen/LinkAllCodegenComponents.h</tt>.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+
+<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="registering_new">Creating new registries</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>The easiest way to get started is to clone one of the existing registries; we
+recommend <tt>llvm/CodeGen/RegAllocRegistry.h</tt>. The key things to modify
+are the class name and the <tt>FunctionPassCtor</tt> type.</p>
+
+<p>Then you need to declare the registry. Example: if your pass registry is
+<tt>RegisterMyPasses</tt> then define;</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+MachinePassRegistry RegisterMyPasses::Registry;
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>And finally, declare the command line option for your passes. Example:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
+ cl::opt<RegisterMyPasses::FunctionPassCtor, false,
+ RegisterPassParser<RegisterMyPasses> >
+ MyPassOpt("mypass",
+ cl::init(&createDefaultMyPass),
+ cl::desc("my pass option help"));
+</pre></div>
+
+<p>Here the command option is "mypass", with createDefaultMyPass as the default
+creator.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<div class="doc_section">
<a name="debughints">Using GDB with dynamically loaded passes</a>
</div>
<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
@@ -1454,7 +1593,7 @@
<p>First thing you do is start <tt>gdb</tt> on the <tt>opt</tt> process:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
$ <b>gdb opt</b>
GNU gdb 5.0
Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@@ -1464,7 +1603,7 @@
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "sparc-sun-solaris2.6"...
(gdb)
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Note that <tt>opt</tt> has a lot of debugging information in it, so it takes
time to load. Be patient. Since we cannot set a breakpoint in our pass yet
@@ -1474,7 +1613,7 @@
<tt>PassManager::run</tt> and then run the process with the arguments you
want:</p>
-<pre>
+<div class="doc_code"><pre>
(gdb) <b>break PassManager::run</b>
Breakpoint 1 at 0x2413bc: file Pass.cpp, line 70.
(gdb) <b>run test.bc -load $(LLVMTOP)/llvm/Debug/lib/[libname].so -[passoption]</b>
@@ -1482,7 +1621,7 @@
Breakpoint 1, PassManager::run (this=0xffbef174, M=@0x70b298) at Pass.cpp:70
70 bool PassManager::run(Module &M) { return PM->run(M); }
(gdb)
-</pre>
+</pre></div>
<p>Once the <tt>opt</tt> stops in the <tt>PassManager::run</tt> method you are
now free to set breakpoints in your pass so that you can trace through execution
@@ -1593,7 +1732,7 @@
<a href="mailto:sabre at nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a><br>
<a href="http://llvm.org">The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br>
- Last modified: $Date: 2006/03/14 05:39:39 $
+ Last modified: $Date: 2006/08/04 18:10:12 $
</address>
</body>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list