[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ATTAsmPrinter.cpp
Reid Spencer
reid at x10sys.com
Wed Jan 25 18:38:44 PST 2006
Evan,
I don't know anything about this stuff, but looking at the pattern, it
seems a mistake may have been made? Consider these:
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 20:27 -0600, Evan Cheng wrote:
> void X86ATTAsmPrinter::printMachineInstruction(const MachineInstr *MI) {
> ++EmittedInsts;
> + // This works around some Darwin assembler bugs.
> + if (forDarwin) {
> + switch (MI->getOpcode()) {
> + case X86::REP_MOVSB:
> + O << "rep/movsb (%esi),(%edi)\n";
> + return;
REP_MOVSB = rep/movsb
> + case X86::REP_MOVSD:
> + O << "rep/movsl (%esi),(%edi)\n";
> + return;
REP_MOVSD != rep/movsl
is this a mistake?
> + case X86::REP_MOVSW:
> + O << "rep/movsw (%esi),(%edi)\n";
> + return;
> + case X86::REP_STOSB:
> + O << "rep/stosb\n";
> + return;
> + case X86::REP_STOSD:
> + O << "rep/stosl\n";
> + return;
and this one?
> + case X86::REP_STOSW:
> + O << "rep/stosw\n";
> + return;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + }
Reid.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20060125/614c6c67/attachment.sig>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list