[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/VMCore/ConstantFolding.cpp
Chris Lattner
lattner at cs.uiuc.edu
Wed Jan 4 23:49:41 PST 2006
Changes in directory llvm/lib/VMCore:
ConstantFolding.cpp updated: 1.80 -> 1.81
---
Log message:
Implement a few symbolic constant folding things. X ? Y : Y is Y.
Fold:
seteq ({ short }* cast (int 1 to { short }*), { short }* null)
setlt ({ short }* cast (int 1 to { short }*), { short }* cast (int 2 to { short }*))
to false/true. These last two commonly occur in the output of compilers that
tag integers, like cozmic's scheme compiler.
Tested by Regression/Assembler/ConstantExprFold.llx
---
Diffs of the changes: (+32 -7)
ConstantFolding.cpp | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: llvm/lib/VMCore/ConstantFolding.cpp
diff -u llvm/lib/VMCore/ConstantFolding.cpp:1.80 llvm/lib/VMCore/ConstantFolding.cpp:1.81
--- llvm/lib/VMCore/ConstantFolding.cpp:1.80 Thu Jan 5 01:19:51 2006
+++ llvm/lib/VMCore/ConstantFolding.cpp Thu Jan 5 01:49:30 2006
@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@
if (isa<UndefValue>(V1)) return const_cast<Constant*>(V2);
if (isa<UndefValue>(V2)) return const_cast<Constant*>(V1);
if (isa<UndefValue>(Cond)) return const_cast<Constant*>(V1);
+ if (V1 == V2) return const_cast<Constant*>(V1);
return 0;
}
@@ -786,16 +787,27 @@
/// constants (like ConstantInt) to be the simplest, followed by
/// GlobalValues, followed by ConstantExpr's (the most complex).
///
-static Instruction::BinaryOps evaluateRelation(const Constant *V1,
- const Constant *V2) {
+static Instruction::BinaryOps evaluateRelation(Constant *V1, Constant *V2) {
assert(V1->getType() == V2->getType() &&
"Cannot compare different types of values!");
if (V1 == V2) return Instruction::SetEQ;
if (!isa<ConstantExpr>(V1) && !isa<GlobalValue>(V1)) {
+ if (!isa<GlobalValue>(V2) && !isa<ConstantExpr>(V2)) {
+ // We distilled this down to a simple case, use the standard constant
+ // folder.
+ ConstantBool *R = dyn_cast<ConstantBool>(ConstantExpr::getSetEQ(V1, V2));
+ if (R == ConstantBool::True) return Instruction::SetEQ;
+ R = dyn_cast<ConstantBool>(ConstantExpr::getSetLT(V1, V2));
+ if (R == ConstantBool::True) return Instruction::SetLT;
+ R = dyn_cast<ConstantBool>(ConstantExpr::getSetGT(V1, V2));
+ if (R == ConstantBool::True) return Instruction::SetGT;
+
+ // If we couldn't figure it out, bail.
+ return Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd;
+ }
+
// If the first operand is simple, swap operands.
- assert((isa<GlobalValue>(V2) || isa<ConstantExpr>(V2)) &&
- "Simple cases should have been handled by caller!");
Instruction::BinaryOps SwappedRelation = evaluateRelation(V2, V1);
if (SwappedRelation != Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd)
return SetCondInst::getSwappedCondition(SwappedRelation);
@@ -826,7 +838,7 @@
} else {
// Ok, the LHS is known to be a constantexpr. The RHS can be any of a
// constantexpr, a CPR, or a simple constant.
- const ConstantExpr *CE1 = cast<ConstantExpr>(V1);
+ ConstantExpr *CE1 = cast<ConstantExpr>(V1);
Constant *CE1Op0 = CE1->getOperand(0);
switch (CE1->getOpcode()) {
@@ -834,9 +846,21 @@
// If the cast is not actually changing bits, and the second operand is a
// null pointer, do the comparison with the pre-casted value.
if (V2->isNullValue() &&
- CE1->getType()->isLosslesslyConvertibleTo(CE1Op0->getType()))
+ (isa<PointerType>(CE1->getType()) || CE1->getType()->isIntegral()))
return evaluateRelation(CE1Op0,
Constant::getNullValue(CE1Op0->getType()));
+
+ // If the dest type is a pointer type, and the RHS is a constantexpr cast
+ // from the same type as the src of the LHS, evaluate the inputs. This is
+ // important for things like "seteq (cast 4 to int*), (cast 5 to int*)",
+ // which happens a lot in compilers with tagged integers.
+ if (ConstantExpr *CE2 = dyn_cast<ConstantExpr>(V2))
+ if (isa<PointerType>(CE1->getType()) &&
+ CE2->getOpcode() == Instruction::Cast &&
+ CE1->getOperand(0)->getType() == CE2->getOperand(0)->getType() &&
+ CE1->getOperand(0)->getType()->isIntegral()) {
+ return evaluateRelation(CE1->getOperand(0), CE2->getOperand(0));
+ }
break;
case Instruction::GetElementPtr:
@@ -977,7 +1001,8 @@
if (SetCondInst::isRelational(Opcode)) {
if (isa<UndefValue>(V1) || isa<UndefValue>(V2))
return UndefValue::get(Type::BoolTy);
- switch (evaluateRelation(V1, V2)) {
+ switch (evaluateRelation(const_cast<Constant*>(V1),
+ const_cast<Constant*>(V2))) {
default: assert(0 && "Unknown relational!");
case Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd:
break; // Couldn't determine anything about these constants.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list