[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
Chris Lattner
lattner at cs.uiuc.edu
Thu Sep 1 23:38:16 PDT 2005
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar:
Reassociate.cpp updated: 1.53 -> 1.54
---
Log message:
Avoid creating garbage instructions, just move the old add instruction
to where we need it when converting -(A+B+C) -> -A + -B + -C.
---
Diffs of the changes: (+11 -9)
Reassociate.cpp | 20 +++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
diff -u llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp:1.53 llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp:1.54
--- llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp:1.53 Fri Sep 2 00:23:22 2005
+++ llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp Fri Sep 2 01:38:04 2005
@@ -318,16 +318,18 @@
//
if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V))
if (I->getOpcode() == Instruction::Add && I->hasOneUse()) {
- Value *RHS = NegateValue(I->getOperand(1), BI);
- Value *LHS = NegateValue(I->getOperand(0), BI);
-
- // We must actually insert a new add instruction here, because the neg
- // instructions do not dominate the old add instruction in general. By
- // adding it now, we are assured that the neg instructions we just
- // inserted dominate the instruction we are about to insert after them.
+ // Push the negates through the add.
+ I->setOperand(0, NegateValue(I->getOperand(0), BI));
+ I->setOperand(1, NegateValue(I->getOperand(1), BI));
+
+ // We must move the add instruction here, because the neg instructions do
+ // not dominate the old add instruction in general. By moving it, we are
+ // assured that the neg instructions we just inserted dominate the
+ // instruction we are about to insert after them.
//
- return BinaryOperator::create(Instruction::Add, LHS, RHS,
- I->getName()+".neg", BI);
+ I->moveBefore(BI);
+ I->setName(I->getName()+".neg");
+ return I;
}
// Insert a 'neg' instruction that subtracts the value from zero to get the
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list