[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
Chris Lattner
lattner at cs.uiuc.edu
Sun May 8 11:59:51 PDT 2005
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar:
Reassociate.cpp updated: 1.41 -> 1.42
---
Log message:
Improve reassociation handling of inverses, implementing inverses.ll.
---
Diffs of the changes: (+104 -2)
Reassociate.cpp | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
diff -u llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp:1.41 llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp:1.42
--- llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp:1.41 Sat May 7 19:19:31 2005
+++ llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp Sun May 8 13:59:37 2005
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
Statistic<> NumLinear ("reassociate","Number of insts linearized");
Statistic<> NumChanged("reassociate","Number of insts reassociated");
Statistic<> NumSwapped("reassociate","Number of insts with operands swapped");
+ Statistic<> NumAnnihil("reassociate","Number of expr tree annihilated");
struct ValueEntry {
unsigned Rank;
@@ -344,18 +345,35 @@
return Mul;
}
+// Scan backwards and forwards among values with the same rank as element i to
+// see if X exists. If X does not exist, return i.
+static unsigned FindInOperandList(std::vector<ValueEntry> &Ops, unsigned i,
+ Value *X) {
+ unsigned XRank = Ops[i].Rank;
+ unsigned e = Ops.size();
+ for (unsigned j = i+1; j != e && Ops[j].Rank == XRank; ++j)
+ if (Ops[j].Op == X)
+ return j;
+ // Scan backwards
+ for (unsigned j = i-1; j != ~0U && Ops[j].Rank == XRank; --j)
+ if (Ops[j].Op == X)
+ return j;
+ return i;
+}
+
void Reassociate::OptimizeExpression(unsigned Opcode,
std::vector<ValueEntry> &Ops) {
// Now that we have the linearized expression tree, try to optimize it.
// Start by folding any constants that we found.
- FoldConstants:
+Iterate:
+ bool IterateOptimization = false;
if (Ops.size() == 1) return;
if (Constant *V1 = dyn_cast<Constant>(Ops[Ops.size()-2].Op))
if (Constant *V2 = dyn_cast<Constant>(Ops.back().Op)) {
Ops.pop_back();
Ops.back().Op = ConstantExpr::get(Opcode, V1, V2);
- goto FoldConstants;
+ goto Iterate;
}
// Check for destructive annihilation due to a constant being used.
@@ -366,6 +384,8 @@
if (CstVal->isNullValue()) { // ... & 0 -> 0
Ops[0].Op = CstVal;
Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+1, Ops.end());
+ ++NumAnnihil;
+ return;
} else if (CstVal->isAllOnesValue()) { // ... & -1 -> ...
Ops.pop_back();
}
@@ -374,6 +394,8 @@
if (CstVal->isNullValue()) { // ... * 0 -> 0
Ops[0].Op = CstVal;
Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+1, Ops.end());
+ ++NumAnnihil;
+ return;
} else if (cast<ConstantInt>(CstVal)->getRawValue() == 1) {
Ops.pop_back(); // ... * 1 -> ...
}
@@ -382,6 +404,8 @@
if (CstVal->isAllOnesValue()) { // ... | -1 -> -1
Ops[0].Op = CstVal;
Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+1, Ops.end());
+ ++NumAnnihil;
+ return;
}
// FALLTHROUGH!
case Instruction::Add:
@@ -393,6 +417,84 @@
// Handle destructive annihilation do to identities between elements in the
// argument list here.
+ switch (Opcode) {
+ default: break;
+ case Instruction::And:
+ case Instruction::Or:
+ case Instruction::Xor:
+ // Scan the operand lists looking for X and ~X pairs, along with X,X pairs.
+ // If we find any, we can simplify the expression. X&~X == 0, X|~X == -1.
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ops.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+ // First, check for X and ~X in the operand list.
+ if (BinaryOperator::isNot(Ops[i].Op)) { // Cannot occur for ^.
+ Value *X = BinaryOperator::getNotArgument(Ops[i].Op);
+ unsigned FoundX = FindInOperandList(Ops, i, X);
+ if (FoundX != i) {
+ if (Opcode == Instruction::And) { // ...&X&~X = 0
+ Ops[0].Op = Constant::getNullValue(X->getType());
+ Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+1, Ops.end());
+ ++NumAnnihil;
+ return;
+ } else if (Opcode == Instruction::Or) { // ...|X|~X = -1
+ Ops[0].Op = ConstantIntegral::getAllOnesValue(X->getType());
+ Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+1, Ops.end());
+ ++NumAnnihil;
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Next, check for duplicate pairs of values, which we assume are next to
+ // each other, due to our sorting criteria.
+ if (i+1 != Ops.size() && Ops[i+1].Op == Ops[i].Op) {
+ if (Opcode == Instruction::And || Opcode == Instruction::Or) {
+ // Drop duplicate values.
+ Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+i);
+ --i; --e;
+ IterateOptimization = true;
+ ++NumAnnihil;
+ } else {
+ assert(Opcode == Instruction::Xor);
+ // ... X^X -> ...
+ Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+i, Ops.begin()+i+2);
+ i -= 2; e -= 2;
+ IterateOptimization = true;
+ ++NumAnnihil;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+
+ case Instruction::Add:
+ // Scan the operand lists looking for X and -X pairs. If we find any, we
+ // can simplify the expression. X+-X == 0
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ops.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+ // Check for X and -X in the operand list.
+ if (BinaryOperator::isNeg(Ops[i].Op)) {
+ Value *X = BinaryOperator::getNegArgument(Ops[i].Op);
+ unsigned FoundX = FindInOperandList(Ops, i, X);
+ if (FoundX != i) {
+ // Remove X and -X from the operand list.
+ if (Ops.size() == 2) {
+ Ops[0].Op = Constant::getNullValue(X->getType());
+ Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+1);
+ ++NumAnnihil;
+ return;
+ } else {
+ Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+i);
+ if (i < FoundX) --FoundX;
+ Ops.erase(Ops.begin()+FoundX);
+ IterateOptimization = true;
+ ++NumAnnihil;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+ //case Instruction::Mul:
+ }
+
+ if (IterateOptimization) goto Iterate;
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list