[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/test/Programs/SingleSource/Regression/C++/CompileFail/2003-09-29-ArgumentNumberMismatch.cpp

[Chris Lattner]

Changes in directory llvm/test/Programs/SingleSource/Regression/C++/CompileFail:

2003-09-29-ArgumentNumberMismatch.cpp updated: 1.1 -> 1.2

---
Log message:

Simplify test, include problem analysis


---
Diffs of the changes:

Index: llvm/test/Programs/SingleSource/Regression/C++/CompileFail/2003-09-29-ArgumentNumberMismatch.cpp
diff -u llvm/test/Programs/SingleSource/Regression/C++/CompileFail/2003-09-29-ArgumentNumberMismatch.cpp:1.1 llvm/test/Programs/SingleSource/Regression/C++/CompileFail/2003-09-29-ArgumentNumberMismatch.cpp:1.2
--- llvm/test/Programs/SingleSource/Regression/C++/CompileFail/2003-09-29-ArgumentNumberMismatch.cpp:1.1	Mon Sep 29 16:18:36 2003
+++ llvm/test/Programs/SingleSource/Regression/C++/CompileFail/2003-09-29-ArgumentNumberMismatch.cpp	Mon Sep 29 16:53:04 2003
@@ -1,11 +1,15 @@
+// Non-POD classes cannot be passed into a function by component, because their
+// dtors must be run.  Instead, pass them in by reference.  The C++ front-end
+// was mistakenly "thinking" that 'foo' took a structure by component.
+
 struct C {
         int A, B;
         ~C() {}
-
-	void operator^(C b) const { }
 };
 
+void foo(C b);
+
 void test(C *P) {
-        *P ^ *P;
+	foo(*P);
 }