[llvm-commits] CVS: llvm/lib/Target/X86/InstSelectSimple.cpp
Brian Gaeke
gaeke at cs.uiuc.edu
Fri Jul 18 15:24:01 PDT 2003
Changes in directory llvm/lib/Target/X86:
InstSelectSimple.cpp updated: 1.113 -> 1.114
---
Log message:
Please, save your applause^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hflames for the end...
Avoid a fall-through in the (stubby) treatment of the longjmp intrinsic
call which causes llc & lli to core-dump.
Add a sort-of treatment of cast double to ulong. I am not really sure
what a user should expect to see upon casting a negative FP value to
unsigned long long. But with what is given here, I was able to write
a program that could cast -123.456 to ulong and back and get -123.0,
which seems like a step in the right direction. GCC seems to give you
0. I don't know if I'd consider that useful.
These cases were coming up in GNU coreutils-5.0.
---
Diffs of the changes:
Index: llvm/lib/Target/X86/InstSelectSimple.cpp
diff -u llvm/lib/Target/X86/InstSelectSimple.cpp:1.113 llvm/lib/Target/X86/InstSelectSimple.cpp:1.114
--- llvm/lib/Target/X86/InstSelectSimple.cpp:1.113 Thu Jul 17 16:30:06 2003
+++ llvm/lib/Target/X86/InstSelectSimple.cpp Fri Jul 18 15:23:43 2003
@@ -980,6 +980,8 @@
case LLVMIntrinsic::longjmp:
BuildMI(X86::CALLpcrel32, 1).addExternalSymbol("abort", true);
+ return;
+
case LLVMIntrinsic::setjmp:
// Setjmp always returns zero...
BuildMI(BB, X86::MOVir32, 1, getReg(CI)).addZImm(0);
@@ -1814,9 +1816,10 @@
case cByte: StoreTy = Type::ShortTy; StoreClass = cShort; break;
case cShort: StoreTy = Type::IntTy; StoreClass = cInt; break;
case cInt: StoreTy = Type::LongTy; StoreClass = cLong; break;
- case cLong:
- assert(0 &&"FIXME not implemented: cast FP to unsigned long long");
- abort();
+ // The following treatment of cLong may not be perfectly right,
+ // but it survives chains of casts of the form
+ // double->ulong->double.
+ case cLong: StoreTy = Type::LongTy; StoreClass = cLong; break;
default: assert(0 && "Unknown store class!");
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list