[llvm-bugs] [Bug 39326] New: RVO fails in template function with 'auto' return type
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 16 09:04:08 PDT 2018
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39326
Bug ID: 39326
Summary: RVO fails in template function with 'auto' return type
Product: clang
Version: 7.0
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: C++14
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: wenzel.jakob at epfl.ch
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
I've run into the following rather bizarre bug on Clang that appears to be a
standard violation: when a function template has an 'auto' return value, return
value optimization (RVO) no longer works. Everything is okay for non-template
functions and functions with an explicitly specified return value type.
Consider the following piece of code that reproduces this issue:
// ========================================================
#include <stdio.h>
struct A {
A() { printf("A::A()\n"); }
A(const A&) { printf("A::A(const A&)\n"); }
A(A&&) { printf("A::A(A&&)\n"); }
~A() { printf("A::~A()\n"); }
A& operator=(const A&) { printf("A::operator=(const A&)\n"); return *this;
}
A& operator=(A&&) { printf("A::operator=(A&&)\n"); return *this;}
};
A test1(int z) { A x; return x; }
auto test2(int z) { A x; return x; }
template <typename T> A test3(T z) { A x; return x; }
template <typename T> auto test4(T z) { A x; return x; } /// <- problem!
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
printf("\n-- Test 1:\n");
test1(1);
printf("\n-- Test 2:\n");
test2(1);
printf("\n-- Test 3:\n");
test3(1);
printf("\n-- Test 4:\n");
test4(1);
return 0;
}
// ========================================================
This produces the following output:
$ clang++ test.cpp -o test -std=c++14
$ ./test
-- Test 1:
A::A()
A::~A()
-- Test 2:
A::A()
A::~A()
-- Test 3:
A::A()
A::~A()
-- Test 4:
A::A()
A::A(A&&)
A::~A()
A::~A()
Comparison (GCC 8):
-- Test 1:
A::A()
A::~A()
-- Test 2:
A::A()
A::~A()
-- Test 3:
A::A()
A::~A()
-- Test 4:
A::A()
A::~A()
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20181016/15134c12/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list